Findings on optical colonoscopy after positive CT colonography exam
- PMID: 18564114
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2008.01919.x
Findings on optical colonoscopy after positive CT colonography exam
Abstract
Background & aims: The aim of this study is to evaluate the findings on optical colonoscopy (OC) after a positive CT colonography (CTC) exam and characterize the type of polyps seen on OC but not reported by CTC.
Methods: Over an 18-month period a total of 159 asymptomatic adults had polyps seen on computed tomography colonography examination and subsequently underwent planned therapeutic optical colonoscopy. The colonoscopists were aware of the findings on CT colonography prior to further evaluation of the colon. Characteristics of polyps and adenomas seen on subsequent optical colonoscopy but not seen or reported on CT colonography were examined.
Results: The adenoma miss rate for CT colonography overall was 18.9% (25/132) including 6.2% (4/65) for polyps >9 mm and 18.2% (8/44) for polyps 6-9 mm. Three of the adenomas >9 mm not seen on CTC were sessile, and two were found in patients with technically difficult CT colonography studies due to poor colonic distention. No adenomas with advanced pathology <6 mm were found on optical colonoscopy but not reported on CT colonography. False-positive CTC referral where no polyp was seen on colonoscopy was 5.0%.
Conclusions: CT colonography has adenoma miss rates similar to miss rates historically found with optical colonoscopy, with most missed adenomas being <10 mm and sessile in shape.
Similar articles
-
[A prospective comparison of video colonoscopy and CT colonography in asymptomatic patients screened for colorectal cancer].Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2010 Aug;135(34-35):1656-61. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1262457. Epub 2010 Aug 18. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2010. PMID: 20721840 German.
-
Comparison of CT colonography, colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy and faecal occult blood tests for the detection of advanced adenoma in an average risk population.Gut. 2009 Feb;58(2):241-8. doi: 10.1136/gut.2008.156448. Epub 2008 Oct 13. Gut. 2009. PMID: 18852257
-
Diagnostic performance of primary 3-dimensional computed tomography colonography in the setting of colonic diverticular disease.Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006 Aug;4(8):1039-47. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2006.04.005. Epub 2006 Jun 21. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006. PMID: 16793347
-
Meta-analysis comparing CT colonography, air contrast barium enema, and colonoscopy.Am J Med. 2007 Mar;120(3):203-210.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2006.05.061. Am J Med. 2007. PMID: 17349438 Review.
-
Virtual colonoscopy in the detection of colonic polyps and neoplasms.Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2006 Feb;20(1):79-92. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2005.08.004. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2006. PMID: 16473802 Review.
Cited by
-
Detection of colorectal adenomas using a bioactivatable probe specific for matrix metalloproteinase activity.Neoplasia. 2011 Aug;13(8):685-91. doi: 10.1593/neo.11400. Neoplasia. 2011. PMID: 21847360 Free PMC article.
-
Carpet lesions detected at CT colonography: clinical, imaging, and pathologic features.Radiology. 2014 Feb;270(2):435-43. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13130812. Epub 2013 Oct 28. Radiology. 2014. PMID: 24029647 Free PMC article.
-
CT colonography: pitfalls in interpretation.Radiol Clin North Am. 2013 Jan;51(1):69-88. doi: 10.1016/j.rcl.2012.09.005. Radiol Clin North Am. 2013. PMID: 23182508 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Missed lesions at CT colonography: lessons learned.Abdom Imaging. 2013 Feb;38(1):82-97. doi: 10.1007/s00261-012-9897-z. Abdom Imaging. 2013. PMID: 22539045 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Positive predictive value for polyps detected at screening CT colonography.Eur Radiol. 2010 Jul;20(7):1651-6. doi: 10.1007/s00330-009-1704-z. Epub 2010 Jan 13. Eur Radiol. 2010. PMID: 20069423
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical