The preferred level of face categorization depends on discriminability
- PMID: 18567265
- DOI: 10.3758/pbr.15.3.623
The preferred level of face categorization depends on discriminability
Abstract
People usually categorize objects more quickly at the basic level (e.g., "dog") than at the subordinate (e.g., "collie") or superordinate (e.g., "animal") levels. Notable exceptions to this rule include objects of expertise, faces, or atypical objects (e.g., "penguin," "poodle"), all of which show faster than normal subordinate-level categorization. We hypothesize that the subordinate-level reaction time advantage for faces is influenced by their discriminability relative to other faces in the stimulus set. First, we replicated the subordinate-level advantage for faces (Experiment 1) and then showed that a basic-level advantage for faces can be elicited by increasing the perceptual similarity of the face stimuli, making discrimination more difficult (Experiment 2). Finally, we repeated both effects within subjects, showing that individual faces were slower to be categorized in the context of similar faces and more quickly categorized among diverse faces (Experiment 3).
Similar articles
-
Familiarity effects on categorization levels of faces and objects.Cognition. 2009 Apr;111(1):144-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.01.002. Epub 2009 Feb 12. Cognition. 2009. PMID: 19217085 Free PMC article.
-
Are all types of expertise created equal? Car experts use different spatial frequency scales for subordinate categorization of cars and faces.PLoS One. 2013 Jun 24;8(6):e67024. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067024. Print 2013. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 23826188 Free PMC article.
-
The entry point of face recognition: evidence for face expertise.J Exp Psychol Gen. 2001 Sep;130(3):534-43. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.130.3.534. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2001. PMID: 11561926
-
Development of face processing.Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2011 Nov;2(6):666-675. doi: 10.1002/wcs.146. Epub 2011 Apr 15. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2011. PMID: 22039564 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A random-walk interpretation of incentive effects in visual discrimination.Behav Processes. 2010 Oct;85(3):209-14. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2010.07.013. Epub 2010 Aug 11. Behav Processes. 2010. PMID: 20708661 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Familiarity effects on categorization levels of faces and objects.Cognition. 2009 Apr;111(1):144-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.01.002. Epub 2009 Feb 12. Cognition. 2009. PMID: 19217085 Free PMC article.
-
Own- and other-race categorization of faces by race, gender, and age.Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Dec;15(6):1093-9. doi: 10.3758/PBR.15.6.1093. Psychon Bull Rev. 2008. PMID: 19001573
-
Stimulus type, level of categorization, and spatial-frequencies utilization: implications for perceptual categorization hierarchies.J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Aug;35(4):1264-73. doi: 10.1037/a0013621. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009. PMID: 19653764 Free PMC article.
-
Explaining the Timing of Natural Scene Understanding with a Computational Model of Perceptual Categorization.PLoS Comput Biol. 2015 Sep 3;11(9):e1004456. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004456. eCollection 2015 Sep. PLoS Comput Biol. 2015. PMID: 26335683 Free PMC article.
-
The role of features and configural processing in face-race classification.Vision Res. 2011 Dec 8;51(23-24):2462-70. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.10.001. Epub 2011 Oct 8. Vision Res. 2011. PMID: 22008980 Free PMC article.