Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Jun 20:8:218.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-218.

What explains between-school differences in rates of smoking?

Affiliations

What explains between-school differences in rates of smoking?

Marion Henderson et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Schools have the potential to influence their pupils' behaviour through the school's social organisation and culture (non-formal school characteristics), as well as through the formal curriculum. This paper examines whether these school characteristics (which include a measure of quality of social relationships) can account for school differences in smoking rates.

Methods: This study uses a longitudinal survey involving 5,092 pupils in 24 Scottish schools. Pupils' smoking (at age 15/16), cognitive measures, attitude to school and pupils' rating of teacher pupil relationships (at age 13/14) were linked to school level data comprising teacher assessed quality of pupil-staff relationships, school level deprivation, staying on rates and attendance. Analysis involved multi-level modelling.

Results: Overall, 25% of males and 39% of females reported smoking, with rates by school ranging from 8% to 33% for males and from 28% to 49% for females. When individual socio-economic and socio-cultural factors were controlled for there was still a large school effect for males and a smaller (but correlated) school effect for females at 15/16 years. For girls their school effect was explained by their rating of teacher-pupil relationships and attitude to school. These variables were also significant in predicting smoking among boys. However, the school effect for boys was most radically attenuated and became insignificant when the interaction between poor quality of teacher - pupil relationships and school level affluence was fitted, explaining 82% of the variance between schools. In addition, researchers' rating of the schools' focus on caring and inclusiveness was also significantly associated with both male and female smoking rates.

Conclusion: School-level characteristics have an impact on male and female pupils' rates of smoking up to 15/16 years of age. The size of the school effect is greater for males at this age. The social environment of schools, in particular the quality of teacher-pupil relationships, pupils' attitude to school and the school's focus on caring and inclusiveness, can influence both boys' and girls' smoking. This provides support for the school-wide or "Health Promoting School" approach to smoking prevention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of participants. N gives number of schools, and n number of pupils.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Data on school level characteristics collected between 1996 and 1998.
Figure 3
Figure 3
A: Plot showing standardized school level residuals (school effects) for males versus females BEFORE adjusting for known predictors of smoking (NULL MODEL). B: Plot showing standardized school level residuals (school effects) for males versus females AFTER adjusting for known predictors of smoking (Model 1, see Table 3). C: Plot showing standardized school level residuals (school effects) for males versus females after adjusting for known predictors of smoking (Model 1, see Table 3) and PRIOR SMOKING. D: Plot showing standardized school level residuals (school effects) for male versus female PUPILS STILL AT SCHOOL after adjusting for known predictors of smoking (Model 1, see Table 3). E: Plot showing standardized school level residuals (school effects) for male versus female PUPILS THAT LEFT SCHOOL EARLY after adjusting for known predictors of smoking (Model 1, see Table 3).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Schools' main focus by boys' and girls' rank for school level smoking rates.

References

    1. Choosing Health . Choosing Health: a consultation to improve people's health. London , HMSO; 2004.
    1. Shibuya K, Ciecierski C, Guindon E, Bettcher DW, Evans DB, Murray CJL. WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control: development of an evidence based global public health treaty. BMJ. 2003;327:154–157. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7407.154. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Coambs RB, Li S, Kozlowski LT. Age Interacts with Heaviness of Smoking in Predicting Success in Cessation of Smoking. American Journal of Epidemiology. 1992;135:240–246. - PubMed
    1. Townsend J, Wilkes H, Haines A, Jarvis M. Adolescent smokers seen in general practice: health, lifestyle, physical measurements, and response to anti-smoking advice. British Medical Journal. 1991;324:1430–1433. - PMC - PubMed
    1. ASH Action on smoking and health: young people and smoking. Fact sheet no.3 http://www.ash.org.uk

Publication types