Neuroticism moderates the daily relation between stressors and memory failures
- PMID: 18573003
- PMCID: PMC4084696
- DOI: 10.1037/0882-7974.23.2.287
Neuroticism moderates the daily relation between stressors and memory failures
Abstract
The present investigation extends previous work on the relationship between daily stressors and memory failures in a naturalistic setting by examining whether this relationship varies across levels of neuroticism. A daily diary study of 333 older adults (mean age = 73.27 years, SD = 7.17) in the Veterans Affairs Normative Aging Study (see A. Spiro & R. Bossé, 2001, for additional information) was used to examine whether there were neuroticism differences in cognitive reactivity to daily stressors. Multilevel models indicated that on days when people high in neuroticism experienced stressors, particularly interpersonal stressors, they were more likely to report memory failures compared to those who were lower in neuroticism. The findings may have important implications for age-related cognitive decline.
Figures


References
-
- Aldwin CM. The Elders Life Stress Inventory (ELSI): Research and clinical applications. In: Keller PA, Heyman SR, editors. Innovations in clinical practice: A sourcebook. Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Press; 1991. pp. 355–364.
-
- Almeida DM, Kessler RC. Everyday stressors and gender differences in daily distress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1998;75:670–680. - PubMed
-
- Almeida DM, Neupert SD, Banks SR, Serido J. Do daily stress processes account for socioeconomic health disparities? Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences. 2005;60:34–39. - PubMed
-
- Almeida DM, Wethington E, Kessler RC. The daily inventory of stressful events: An investigator-based approach for measuring daily stressors. Assessment. 2002;9:41–55. - PubMed
-
- Baltes PB, Baltes MM. Psychological perspectives on successful aging: The model of selective optimization with compensation. In: Baltes PB, Baltes MB, editors. Successful aging: Perspectives from the behavioral sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1990. pp. 1–34.