Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2008 Aug;17(8):1096-100.
doi: 10.1007/s00586-008-0705-y. Epub 2008 Jun 25.

A prospective cohort study comparing the VAS spine score and Roland-Morris disability questionnaire in patients with a type A traumatic thoracolumbar spinal fracture

J Siebenga  1 , V J M Leferink, M J M Segers, M J Elzinga, F C Bakker, Duis Hj Ten, P M Rommens, P Patka
Affiliations
Comparative Study

A prospective cohort study comparing the VAS spine score and Roland-Morris disability questionnaire in patients with a type A traumatic thoracolumbar spinal fracture

J Siebenga et al. Eur Spine J. 2008 Aug.

Abstract

The Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ-24) and the VAS spine score have been regularly used to measure functional outcome in patients with back pain. The RMDQ-24 is primarily used in degenerative disease of the spine and the VAS Spine is used in trauma patients. The aim of this study is to compare these scores and to see if there is a correlation in patients with a traumatic thoracolumbar spinal fracture. Prospective cohort study comparing the RMDQ-24 and the VAS spine score in patients with a traumatic type A fracture thoracolumbar spine fracture. Fifteen non-operatively patients (group one) completed 118 questionnaires and 17 operatively treated patients (group two) completed 140 questionnaires. Group one scored an average of 6.6 and 65.9 for the RMDQ-24 and VAS Spine, in group two this was 5.1 and 82.9. Spearman's correlation test showed a significant correlation, in group one 0.83 and for the second group 0.87. RMDQ-24 and VAS Spine have a strong positive correlation in measuring disability in a group of patients with back pain because of a spinal fracture. In both non-operatively and operatively treated groups this correlation is significant.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Visual analogue scale
Plot 1
Plot 1
Scatter plot of conservatively and operatively treated group
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Denis F, Armstrong GW, Searls K, Matta L (1984) Acute thoracolumbar burst fractures in the absence of neurologic deficit. A comparison between operative and nonoperative treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res (189):142–149 - PubMed
    1. Grotle M, Brox JI, Vollestad NK. Concurrent comparison of responsiveness in pain and functional status measurements used for patients with low back pain. Spine. 2004;29(21):E492–E501. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000143664.02702.0b. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jordan K, Dunn KM, Lewis M, Croft P. A minimal clinically important difference was derived for the Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire for low back pain. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59(1):45–52. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.03.018. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Knop C, Blauth M, Bastian L, Lange U, Kesting J, Tscherne H (1997) Fractures of the thoracolumbar spine. Late results of dorsal instrumentation and its consequences. Unfallchirurg 100(8):630–639. Frakturen der thorakolumbalen Wirbelsaule. Spatergebnisse nach dorsaler Instrumentierung und ihre Konsequenzen. doi:10.1007/s001130050168 - PubMed
    1. Knop C, Oeser M, Bastian L, Lange U, Zdichavsky M, Blauth M (2001) Development and validation of the visual analogue scale (VAS) spine score. Unfallchirurg 104(6):488–497. Entwicklung und Validierung des VAS-Wirbelsaulenscores. doi:10.1007/s001130170111 - PubMed

Publication types