The effects of complexity on the perception of vibrotactile patterns
- PMID: 1857630
- DOI: 10.3758/bf03212191
The effects of complexity on the perception of vibrotactile patterns
Abstract
Vibrotactile patterns were presented to subjects' left index fingerpads using the array from the Optacon. A set of simple (one-line) patterns and a set of complex (two-line) patterns were constructed so that they were equally identifiable when presented individually. In Experiment 1, discrimination performance was lower for two-line patterns than for one-line patterns. Communality, the number of lines that two patterns share in common, appeared to be the major factor in reducing discrimination performance for two-line patterns. Experiment 2 measured the time required to identify individual patterns. There was no significant difference in identification times for one- and two-line patterns, suggesting that features within a pattern were processed simultaneously. In the presence of a temporal masking stimulus (Experiment 3), two-line patterns were more difficult to identify than one-line patterns, but reaction times were similar for the two sets of patterns. The results suggest that varying complexity affects perception of patterns at later stages of processing.
Similar articles
-
The effect of location on the discrimination of spatial vibrotactile patterns.Percept Psychophys. 1995 May;57(4):463-74. doi: 10.3758/bf03213072. Percept Psychophys. 1995. PMID: 7596744 Clinical Trial.
-
The effects of complexity on the perception of vibrotactile patterns presented to separate fingers.Percept Psychophys. 1992 Aug;52(2):201-10. doi: 10.3758/bf03206773. Percept Psychophys. 1992. PMID: 1508627
-
Tactile pattern perception and its perturbations.J Acoust Soc Am. 1985 Jan;77(1):238-46. doi: 10.1121/1.392265. J Acoust Soc Am. 1985. PMID: 3882802 Review.
-
A comparison of discrimination and identification of vibrotactile patterns.Percept Psychophys. 1989 Jan;45(1):21-30. doi: 10.3758/bf03208028. Percept Psychophys. 1989. PMID: 2913566
-
Tactile pattern perception.Perception. 1981;10(1):5-27. doi: 10.1068/p100005. Perception. 1981. PMID: 7019848 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Poor resolution at the back of the tongue is the bottleneck for spatial pattern recognition.Sci Rep. 2020 Feb 12;10(1):2435. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-59102-3. Sci Rep. 2020. PMID: 32051455 Free PMC article.
-
The effect of location on the discrimination of spatial vibrotactile patterns.Percept Psychophys. 1995 May;57(4):463-74. doi: 10.3758/bf03213072. Percept Psychophys. 1995. PMID: 7596744 Clinical Trial.
-
Vision is superior to touch in shape perception even with equivalent peripheral input.J Neurophysiol. 2016 Jan 1;115(1):92-9. doi: 10.1152/jn.00654.2015. Epub 2015 Oct 28. J Neurophysiol. 2016. PMID: 26510760 Free PMC article.
-
The effects of complexity on the perception of vibrotactile patterns presented to separate fingers.Percept Psychophys. 1992 Aug;52(2):201-10. doi: 10.3758/bf03206773. Percept Psychophys. 1992. PMID: 1508627
-
Vibrotactile pattern discrimination and communality at several body sites.Percept Psychophys. 1995 Jul;57(5):724-37. doi: 10.3758/bf03213276. Percept Psychophys. 1995. PMID: 7644331
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Other Literature Sources