Dispelling the myths behind pediatric patch testing-experience from our tertiary care patch testing centers
- PMID: 18577031
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1470.2008.00670.x
Dispelling the myths behind pediatric patch testing-experience from our tertiary care patch testing centers
Abstract
Allergic contact dermatitis is now known to be a common problem in pediatric populations, accounting for up to 20% of all dermatitis seen in children. Seminal studies conducted over the past decade have demonstrated a prevalence rate in the range of 25% to 60% of children referred for epicutaneous patch testing. This patch test procedure is generally accepted as the gold standardin vivo technique to diagnose allergic contact dermatitis. However, the overwhelming majority of research studies to date have been conducted on adult populations. Increasingly, pediatric patients are undergoing patch test procedures with techniques that have been standardized and optimized almost exclusively in adults. With this article, we hope to emphasize common misconceptions and pitfalls encountered with this approach. In addition, we hope to stimulate research interest in this field so as to determine the optimum patch test conditions and techniques for children.
Comment in
-
Patch testing children--what should we change?Pediatr Dermatol. 2008 May-Jun;25(3):420-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1470.2008.00713.x. Pediatr Dermatol. 2008. PMID: 18577074 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Patch testing children--what should we change?Pediatr Dermatol. 2008 May-Jun;25(3):420-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1470.2008.00713.x. Pediatr Dermatol. 2008. PMID: 18577074 No abstract available.
-
Contact allergy in children referred for patch testing: North American Contact Dermatitis Group data, 2001-2004.Arch Dermatol. 2008 Oct;144(10):1329-36. doi: 10.1001/archderm.144.10.1329. Arch Dermatol. 2008. PMID: 18936397
-
Patch tests in children with suspected allergic contact dermatitis: a prospective study and review of the literature.Dermatology. 2009;218(2):119-25. doi: 10.1159/000165629. Epub 2008 Oct 22. Dermatology. 2009. PMID: 18946202 Review.
-
Patch testing: pitfalls and performance.Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006 Oct;6(5):340-4. doi: 10.1097/01.all.0000244794.03239.8e. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006. PMID: 16954787 Review.
-
Allergic contact dermatitis in children: should pattern of dermatitis determine referral? A retrospective study of 500 children tested between 1995 and 2004 in one U.K. centre.Br J Dermatol. 2006 Jan;154(1):114-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2005.06845.x. Br J Dermatol. 2006. PMID: 16403103
Cited by
-
A cross-sectional study of contact allergens in feminine hygiene wipes: a possible cause of vulvar contact dermatitis.Int J Womens Dermatol. 2022 Nov 28;8(4):e060. doi: 10.1097/JW9.0000000000000060. eCollection 2022 Dec. Int J Womens Dermatol. 2022. PMID: 36448019 Free PMC article.
-
[Contact allergy in children].Hautarzt. 2009 Mar;60(3):194-6, 198-9. doi: 10.1007/s00105-008-1657-1. Hautarzt. 2009. PMID: 19238342 German.
-
Allergic contact dermatitis in children: review of the past decade.Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2014 Apr;14(4):421. doi: 10.1007/s11882-014-0421-0. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2014. PMID: 24504525 Review.
-
Resistant palmoplantar lesions in patients of psoriasis: evaluation of the causes and comparison of the frequency of delayed-type hypersensitivity in patients without palm and sole lesions.Med Princ Pract. 2014;23(6):561-7. doi: 10.1159/000365573. Epub 2014 Sep 3. Med Princ Pract. 2014. PMID: 25196021 Free PMC article.
-
Patch-test results in children and adolescents: systematic review of a 15-year period.An Bras Dermatol. 2016 Jan-Feb;91(1):64-72. doi: 10.1590/abd1806-4841.20163927. An Bras Dermatol. 2016. PMID: 26982781 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous