Point of care testing to improve glycemic control
- PMID: 18578216
- PMCID: PMC3782994
- DOI: 10.1108/09526860810868256
Point of care testing to improve glycemic control
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to pilot-test the feasibility and impact of protocol-driven point-of-care HbAlc testing on levels of glycemic control and on rates of diabetic regimen intensification in an urban community health center serving low-income patients.
Design/methodology/approach: The paper suggests a primary care process re-design, using point of care finger-stick HbA1c testing under a standing order protocol that provided test results to the provider at patient visit.
Findings: The paper finds that the protocol was well received by both nurses and physicians. HbA1c testing rates increased from 73.6 percent to 86.8 percent (p = 0.40, n = 106). For the 69 patients who had both pre- and post-intervention results, HbAlc levels decreased significantly from 8.55 to 7.84 (p = 0.004, n = 69). At baseline, the health center as a system was relatively ineffective in responding to elevated HbA1c levels. An opportunity to intensify, i.e. a face-to-face visit with lab results available, occurred for only 68.6 percent of elevated HbAlc levels before the intervention, vs. 100 percent post-intervention (p < 0.001). Only 28.6 percent of patients with HbAlc levels >8.0 had their regimens intensified in the pre-intervention phase, compared with 53.8 percent in the post-intervention phase (p = 0.03).
Research limitations/implications: This was a pilot-study in one urban health center. Larger group-randomized controlled trials are needed.
Practical implications: The health center's performance as a system, improved significantly as a way of intensifying diabetic regimens thereby achieving improved glycemic control.
Originality/value: This intervention is feasible, replicable and scalable and does not rely on changing physician behaviors to improve primary care diabetic outcomes.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Impact of HbA1c Testing at Point of Care on Diabetes Management.J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017 May;11(3):611-617. doi: 10.1177/1932296816678263. Epub 2016 Nov 27. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017. PMID: 27898388 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The impact of a physician-directed health information technology system on diabetes outcomes in primary care: a pre- and post-implementation study.Inform Prim Care. 2009;17(3):165-74. doi: 10.14236/jhi.v17i3.731. Inform Prim Care. 2009. PMID: 20074429
-
Improvements in diabetic care as measured by HbA1c after a physician education project.Diabetes Care. 1999 Oct;22(10):1612-6. doi: 10.2337/diacare.22.10.1612. Diabetes Care. 1999. PMID: 10526723
-
Glycemic control in patients with diabetes in Finland.Diabetes Care. 1999 Apr;22(4):575-9. doi: 10.2337/diacare.22.4.575. Diabetes Care. 1999. PMID: 10189534
-
Point-of-Care Hemoglobin A1c Testing: An Evidence-Based Analysis.Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2014 Jul 1;14(8):1-30. eCollection 2014. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2014. PMID: 26316922 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Impact of HbA1c Testing at Point of Care on Diabetes Management.J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017 May;11(3):611-617. doi: 10.1177/1932296816678263. Epub 2016 Nov 27. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017. PMID: 27898388 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Implementation of A1C Point-of-Care Testing: Serving Under-Resourced Adults With Type 2 Diabetes in a Public Health Department.Clin Diabetes. 2019 Jul;37(3):242-249. doi: 10.2337/cd18-0082. Clin Diabetes. 2019. PMID: 31371855 Free PMC article.
-
The state of point-of-care testing: a European perspective.Ups J Med Sci. 2015 Mar;120(1):1-10. doi: 10.3109/03009734.2015.1006347. Epub 2015 Jan 26. Ups J Med Sci. 2015. PMID: 25622619 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Usefulness of point-of-care testing in the treatment of diabetes in an underserved population.J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2009 Jul 1;3(4):672-6. doi: 10.1177/193229680900300409. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2009. PMID: 20144311 Free PMC article.
-
A High Level of Patient Activation Is Observed But Unrelated to Glycemic Control Among Adults With Type 2 Diabetes.Diabetes Spectr. 2010 Jul 1;23(3):171-176. doi: 10.2337/diaspect.23.3.171. Diabetes Spectr. 2010. PMID: 26005310 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Allsworth JE, Toppa R, Palin NC, Lapane KL. Racial and ethnic disparities in the pharmacologic management of diabetes mellitus among long-term care facility residents. Ethnicity and Disease. 2005;15(2):205–12. - PubMed
-
- Barnes CS, Ziemer DC, Miller CD, Doyle JP, Watkins C, Jr, Cook CB, Gallina DL, El-Kebbi I, Branch WT, Jr, Phillips LS. Little time for diabetes management in the primary care setting. Diabetes Education. 2004;30(1):126–35. - PubMed
-
- Belfiglio M, De Berardis G, Franciosi M, Cavaliere D, Di Nardo B, Greenfield S, Kaplan SH, Pellegrini F, Sacco M, Tognoni G, Valentini M, Nicolucci A, Caimi V, Capani F, Corsi A, Della Vedova R, Massi Benedetti M, Nicolucci A, Taboga C, Tombesi M, Vespasiani G. QuED Study Group – quality of care and outcomes in type 2 diabetes. The relationship between physicians’ self-reported target fasting blood glucose levels and metabolic control in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2001;24(3):423–9. - PubMed
-
- Bernard AM, Anderson L, Cook CB, Phillips LS. What do internal medicine residents need to enhance their diabetes care? Diabetes Care. 1999;22(5):661–6. - PubMed
-
- Bodenheimer T, Wagner EH, Grumbach K. Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness: the chronic care model, part 2. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2002;288(15):1909–14. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous