Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Jul 24;51(14):4179-87.
doi: 10.1021/jm800025e. Epub 2008 Jun 25.

N-Hydroxypyrazolyl glycine derivatives as selective N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptor ligands

Affiliations

N-Hydroxypyrazolyl glycine derivatives as selective N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptor ligands

Rasmus P Clausen et al. J Med Chem. .

Abstract

A series of analogues based on N-hydroxypyrazole as a bioisostere for the distal carboxylate group of aspartate have been designed, synthesized, and pharmacologically characterized. Affinity studies on the major glutamate receptor subgroups show that these 4-substituted N-hydroxypyrazol-5-yl glycine (NHP5G) derivatives are selectively recognized by N-methyl- d-aspartic acid (NMDA) receptors and that the ( R)-enantiomers are preferred. Moreover, several of the compounds are able to discriminate between individual subtypes among the NMDA receptors, providing new pharmacological tools. For example, 4-propyl NHP5G is an antagonist at the NR1/NR2A subtype but an agonist at the NR1/NR2D subtype. Molecular docking studies indicate that the substituent protrudes into a region that may be further exploited to improve subtype selectivity, thereby opening up a design strategy for ligands which can differentiate individual NMDA receptor subtypes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Structures of the excitatory amino acids glutamic acid and aspartic acid and bioisosteric analogues of these compounds with activity at the glutamate receptors.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Two chiral HPLC chromatograms of (S)- and (R)-6d, respectively, showing the elution order on an analytical Crownpak CR(−) column. The order is reversed on a preparative Crownpak CR(+) column.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Electronic Circular Dichroism spectra (A) of compounds (R)- and (S)-6f at a concentration of 0.325 mg/mL in H2O compared with a TD-DFT simulated spectra (B) of a weighted average of eight low energy conformers as well as a single low energy conformer of (S)-6f in dilute acid.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Mean concentration–response curves for racemic compounds Et- (6c), Pr- (6d) and Cl-NHP5G (6f) determined using two-electrode voltage-clamp recordings on Xenopus oocytes expressing NR1 in combination with NR2A-D. The curves are normalized to the maximal current response (Imax) in the same recording. Data points are represented as mean ± SEM. All EC50-values are listed in Table 2.
Figure 5
Figure 5
A) Comparison of maximal currents induced by Et- (6c), Pr- (6d) and Cl-NHP5G (6f) relative to Glu at NR1/NR2A-D subtypes. All bars are represented as mean ±SEM. All relative Imax-values are listed in Table 2. B) Representative current responses obtained from a two-electrode voltage-clamp recording on a Xenopus oocyte expressing NR1/NR2A receptors. Currents were evoked by Glu alone or co-application of Glu and Pr-NHP5G at the concentrations indicated above each response.
Figure 6
Figure 6
A) Mean concentration–response curves for compounds (R)-6a-d,f (R=H, Me, Et, n-Pr, Cl, respectively) determined using two-electrode voltage-clamp recordings on Xenopus oocytes expressing NR1/NR2B receptors. The curves are normalized to the maximal current response (Imax) to Glu in the same recording. Data points are represented as mean ± SEM. All EC50-values are listed in Table 3. B) Bar graph showing the maximal currents (Imax) of the ligands relative to the maximal current induced bu Glu. C) Representative current responses obtained from a two-electrode voltage-clamp recording on a Xenopus oocyte expressing NR1/NR2B receptors. Currents were evoked by Glu alone or co-application of Glu and (R)-6e at the concentrations indicated above each response.
Figure 7
Figure 7
A) Structure of a homology model of the ABD of NR2B (cyan) containing n-Pr-NHP5G ((R)-6d, blue) showing the residues (red) lining a crevice to the agonist binding site. Previous studies have shown these residues to be important determinants of agonist efficacies of several compounds. B) Et-NHP5G ((R)-6c, pink) and n-Pr-NHP5G ((R)-6d, blue) docked in the homology model. The distances from the amino group of Lys485 to the n-propyl group and the peptide carbonyl between Arg712 and Gly713 are indicated in Ångstroms. Water molecules are shown as red asterisks.
Scheme 1
Scheme 1
Reagents and conditions: a) I-Cl; b) 1. i-PrMgCl, −78°C, THF; 2. RC=OR′; c) TFA, Et3SiH; d) SO2Cl2 (for 10e); e) 1. n-BuLi, −78°C; 2. Diethyl N-Boc iminomalonate; f) H2, Pd/C, MeOH; g) 1. LiOH; 2. HCl

References

    1. Bräuner-Osborne H, Egebjerg J, Nielsen EØ, Madsen U, Krogsgaard-Larsen P. Ligands for glutamate receptors: Design and therapeutic prospects. J Med Chem. 2000;43:2609–2645. - PubMed
    1. Dingledine R, Borges K, Bowie D, Traynelis SF. The Glutamate Receptor Ion Channels. Pharmacol Rev. 1999;51:7–62. - PubMed
    1. Erreger K, Chen PE, Wyllie DJ, Traynelis SF. Glutamate receptor gating. Crit Rev Neurobiol. 2004;16:187–224. - PubMed
    1. Riedel G, Platt B, Micheau J. Glutamate receptor function in learning and memory. Behav Brain Res. 2003;140:1–47. - PubMed
    1. Javitt DC. Glutamate as a therapeutic target in psychiatric disorders. Mol Psychiatry. 2004;9:984–997. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources