Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2008 Jul-Aug;56(4):269-77.
doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.41410.

Post-penetrating keratoplasty glaucoma

Affiliations
Review

Post-penetrating keratoplasty glaucoma

Tanuj Dada et al. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2008 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

Post-penetrating keratoplasty (post-PK) glaucoma is an important cause of irreversible visual loss and graft failure. The etiology for this disorder is multifactorial, and with the use of new diagnostic equipment, it is now possible to elucidate the exact pathophysiology of this condition. A clear understanding of the various mechanisms that operate during different time frames following PK is essential to chalk out the appropriate management algorithms. The various issues with regard to its management, including the putative risk factors, intraocular pressure (IOP) assessment post-PK, difficulties in monitoring with regard to the visual fields and optic nerve evaluation, are discussed. A step-wise approach to management starting from the medical management to surgery with and without metabolites and the various cycloablative procedures in cases of failed filtering procedures and excessive perilimbal scarring is presented. Finally, the important issue of minimizing the incidence of glaucoma following PK, especially through the use of oversized grafts and iris tightening procedures in the form of concomitant iridoplasty are emphasized. It is important to weigh the risk-benefit ratio of any modality used in the treatment of this condition as procedures aimed at IOP reduction, namely trabeculectomy with antimetabolites, and glaucoma drainage devices can trigger graft rejection, whereas cyclodestructive procedures can not only cause graft failure but also precipitate phthisis bulbi. Watchful expectancy and optimal time of intervention can salvage both graft and vision in this challenging condition.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) Graft corneal edema due to peripheral anterior synechiae (PAS) and secondary glaucoma. (B) PAS - gonioscopic view
Figure 2
Figure 2
PAS on ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) (copyright owner Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, 2008)
Figure 3
Figure 3
Graft host junction (GH Jn) synechia on UBM (copyright owner Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, 2008)
Figure 4
Figure 4
Both PAS and GH Jn synechiae (copyright owner Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, 2008)
Figure 5
Figure 5
Central iris corneal synechia with ACIOL tilt (copyright owner Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, 2008)
Figure 6
Figure 6
IOL iris synechia (copyright owner Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, 2008)
Figure 7
Figure 7
PK with concomitant iridoplasty (courtesy of Dr. Namrata Sharma, Dr. R.P. Centre)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Foulks GN. Glaucoma associated with penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 1987;94:871–4. - PubMed
    1. Wilson SE, Kaufman HE. Graft failure after penetrating keratoplasty. Surv Ophthalmol. 1990;34:325–56. - PubMed
    1. Goldberg DB, Schanzlin DJ, Brown SI. Incidence of increased intraocular pressure after keratolasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 1981;92:372–7. - PubMed
    1. Ayyala RS. Penetrating keratoplasty and glaucoma. Surv Ophthalmol. 2000;45:91–105. - PubMed
    1. Irvine AR, Kaufman HE. Intraocular pressure following penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 1969;68:835–44. - PubMed

Substances