Patterns of contraceptive use in the United States: the importance of religious factors
- PMID: 1858103
Patterns of contraceptive use in the United States: the importance of religious factors
Abstract
Previous research has shown that the major religious communities in the US have all shifted their expected family size downward but significant differences in contraceptive use styles continue to characterize Catholics, Protestants, Jews, and those of no religious affiliation. This paper examines data from Cycle IV of the National Survey of Family Growth (1988) to extend the time period covered by previous research by comparing the emerging contraceptive use patterns and fertility expectations among women in the late 1980s with earlier cohorts from previous national studies, beginning in the 1960s. The categories of religious affiliation are extended to include specific religious denominations (fundamentalist Protestants, Baptists, and other denominations, as well as Mormons) and include measures of religiosity--church attendance, the extent of receiving communion among Catholics, and attendance at church-related schools. These data are examined for blacks, Hispanics, and non-Hispanic whites. The analysis suggests how religious affiliation and religiosity continue to be important factors in the contraceptive paths to low fertility under general conditions of controlled fertility and in the context of secularization.
Similar articles
-
Religious affiliation and contraceptive usage: changing American patterns, 1955-82.Stud Fam Plann. 1988 Jan-Feb;19(1):48-57. Stud Fam Plann. 1988. PMID: 3363605
-
The initiation of adolescent sexual and contraceptive behavior during changing times.J Health Soc Behav. 1996 Mar;37(1):59-74. J Health Soc Behav. 1996. PMID: 8820311
-
Contraceptive use in Canada, 1984.Fam Plann Perspect. 1985 Sep-Oct;17(5):209-15. Fam Plann Perspect. 1985. PMID: 3842662
-
Religious involvement and adult mortality in the United States: review and perspective.South Med J. 2004 Dec;97(12):1223-30. doi: 10.1097/01.SMJ.0000146547.03382.94. South Med J. 2004. PMID: 15646761 Review.
-
Religious Denomination, Religiosity, Religious Attendance, and Cancer Prevention. A Systematic Review.Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2022 Jan 16;15:45-58. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S341085. eCollection 2022. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2022. PMID: 35079226 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Sterilization, Infecundity, and Reproductive Autonomy in Rural, Suburban, and Urban America: Results From a National Survey.Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2025 Mar;57(1):72-84. doi: 10.1111/psrh.70006. Epub 2025 Mar 16. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2025. PMID: 40090703 Free PMC article.
-
Ready, Willing, and Able: Contraceptive Use Patterns Across Europe.Eur J Popul. 2016 Mar 10;32(4):543-573. doi: 10.1007/s10680-016-9378-0. eCollection 2016 Oct. Eur J Popul. 2016. PMID: 30976222 Free PMC article.
-
Hormonal Contraception and the Informed Consent.Linacre Q. 2018 Nov;85(4):375-384. doi: 10.1177/0024363918813579. Epub 2018 Dec 4. Linacre Q. 2018. PMID: 32431374 Free PMC article.
-
Religion and Fertility in Western Europe: Trends Across Cohorts in Britain, France and the Netherlands.Eur J Popul. 2016;32(2):231-265. doi: 10.1007/s10680-015-9371-z. Epub 2016 Jan 28. Eur J Popul. 2016. PMID: 27340312 Free PMC article.
-
The association between religious homogamy and reproduction.Proc Biol Sci. 2016 Jul 13;283(1834):20160294. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2016.0294. Proc Biol Sci. 2016. PMID: 27412283 Free PMC article.