Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Dec;18(12):2739-44.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-008-1061-3. Epub 2008 Jun 26.

CT findings in silicosis due to denim sandblasting

Affiliations

CT findings in silicosis due to denim sandblasting

Fatih Alper et al. Eur Radiol. 2008 Dec.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to describe the findings of CT performed on denim sandblasters with silicosis. Fifty consecutive male patients with silicosis were evaluated. Their clinical data and pulmonary function tests (PFT) were obtained. The CT findings were recorded and the correlations between CT nodular profusion score and the other parameters were assessed. The diagnoses of the patients were classified as accelerated silicosis (n = 43) and acute silicosis (n = 7). The most common CT finding was centrilobular nodules. Twenty-three patients had complicated silicosis based on pleural involvement and presence of progressive massive fibrosis (PMF). Lymphadenopathy (LAP) was positive in 50% of the patients, with calcification in 24%. The CT grade was highly correlated with the clinical data such as exposure duration and PFT. Our findings suggest that the clinical manifestation of silicosis in denim sandblasters is severe. Although the duration of exposure is shorter the rate of complicated silicosis patients with pleural involvement was unexpectedly higher in the cases. Because the most common radiological appearance was nodules and the CT grading of the nodules was highly correlated with the clinical data, nodule grading may be used in the management of such cases.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Occup Health. 2005 Jul;47(4):346-9 - PubMed
    1. Occup Med (Lond). 2006 Dec;56(8):554-8 - PubMed
    1. Acta Radiol. 1994 Jul;35(4):351-6 - PubMed
    1. Radiology. 2003 Sep;228(3):816-25 - PubMed
    1. Radiol Clin North Am. 2002 Jan;40(1):43-59 - PubMed