Differentiation between classic and atypical meningiomas with use of diffusion tensor imaging
- PMID: 18583409
- PMCID: PMC8118781
- DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1170
Differentiation between classic and atypical meningiomas with use of diffusion tensor imaging
Abstract
Background and purpose: The differentiation between classic and atypical meningiomas may have implications in preoperative planning but may not be possible on the basis of conventional MR imaging. Our hypothesis was that classic and atypical meningiomas have different patterns of intratumoral water diffusion that will allow for differentiation between them.
Materials and methods: Preoperative diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) was performed in 12 classic and 12 atypical meningiomas. Signal intensity of solid-enhancing tumor regions on diffusion-weighted trace images and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and fractional anisotropy (FA) maps was assessed. Regions of interest (ROIs) were placed in solid-enhancing regions, peritumoral edema, and contralateral normal-appearing white matter (NAWM) to measure tensor metrics including major (lambda(1)), intermediate (lambda(2)) and minor eigenvalues (lambda(3)) and FA and ADC values. Distribution of tensor shapes within enhancing tumors was calculated for all tumors. Differences between classic and atypical meningiomas in tumor signal intensity, intratumoral and peritumoral tensor metrics, as well as tensor shapes distribution were statistically analyzed.
Results: A significantly greater proportion of atypical meningiomas were isointense and hypointense on ADC maps (P = .007). Classic meningiomas had significantly lower FA (P = .012), higher ADC (P = .011), greater lambda(2) (P = .020) and lambda(3) (P = .003). There was significantly more spherical diffusion in classic than in atypical meningiomas (P = .020). All diffusion tensor metrics for peritumoral edema of the 2 tumor groups did not differ.
Conclusion: DTI showed that intratumoral microscopic water motion is less organized in classic than in atypical meningiomas. This feature may allow for noninvasive differentiation between classic and atypical meningiomas.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Peritumoral brain regions in gliomas and meningiomas: investigation with isotropic diffusion-weighted MR imaging and diffusion-tensor MR imaging.Radiology. 2004 Aug;232(2):451-60. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2322030959. Epub 2004 Jun 23. Radiology. 2004. PMID: 15215555
-
Diffusion tensor imaging provides an insight into the microstructure of meningiomas, high-grade gliomas, and peritumoral edema.J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2012 Sep-Oct;36(5):577-82. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e318261e913. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2012. PMID: 22992609
-
Tumor extension in high-grade gliomas assessed with diffusion magnetic resonance imaging: values and lesion-to-brain ratios of apparent diffusion coefficient and fractional anisotropy.Acta Radiol. 2006 Apr;47(3):311-9. doi: 10.1080/02841850500539058. Acta Radiol. 2006. PMID: 16613314
-
Diffusion-weighted MR of the brain: methodology and clinical application.Radiol Med. 2005 Mar;109(3):155-97. Radiol Med. 2005. PMID: 15775887 Review. English, Italian.
-
The role of diffusion tensor imaging in the evaluation of ischemic brain injury - a review.NMR Biomed. 2002 Nov-Dec;15(7-8):561-9. doi: 10.1002/nbm.786. NMR Biomed. 2002. PMID: 12489102 Review.
Cited by
-
Preoperative Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values for Differentiation between Low and High Grade Meningiomas: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Mar 4;12(3):630. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12030630. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35328183 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Distinguishing grade I meningioma from higher grade meningiomas without biopsy.Oncotarget. 2015 Nov 10;6(35):38421-8. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.5376. Oncotarget. 2015. PMID: 26472106 Free PMC article.
-
Malignant Meningiomas: From Diagnostics to Treatment.Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Feb 23;15(5):538. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15050538. Diagnostics (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40075786 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Prediction of high-grade meningioma by preoperative MRI assessment.J Neurooncol. 2012 May;108(1):147-52. doi: 10.1007/s11060-012-0809-4. Epub 2012 Feb 12. J Neurooncol. 2012. PMID: 22327898
-
Apparent diffusion coefficient measurements in the differentiation between benign and malignant lesions: a systematic review.Insights Imaging. 2012 Aug;3(4):395-409. doi: 10.1007/s13244-012-0175-y. Epub 2012 Jun 7. Insights Imaging. 2012. PMID: 22695951 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Bondy M, Ligon BL. Epidemiology and etiology of intracranial meningiomas: a review. J Neurooncol 1996;29:197–205 - PubMed
-
- Willis J, Smith C, Ironside JW, et al. The accuracy of meningioma grading: a 10-year retrospective audit. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 2005;31:141–49 - PubMed
-
- Modha A, Gutin PH. Diagnosis and treatment of atypical and anaplastic meningiomas: a review. Neurosurgery 2005;57:538–50 - PubMed
-
- Demaerel P, Wilms G, Lammens M, et al. Intracranial meningiomas: correlation between MR imaging and histology in fifty patients. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1991;15:45–51 - PubMed
-
- Perry A, Louis DN, Scheithauer BW, et al. Meningiomas. In: Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, et al, eds. WHO Classification of Tumours of the Central Nervous System. Lyon: IARC Press;2007. :164–72
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical