Advantages of magnification in digital phase-contrast mammography using a practical X-ray tube
- PMID: 18584984
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.04.041
Advantages of magnification in digital phase-contrast mammography using a practical X-ray tube
Abstract
Phase-contrast imaging with a practical cone-beam X-ray tube has been realized for clinical use in digital mammography using computed radiography (CR). To perform phase-contrast imaging, the X-ray detector must be distanced from an object so that the phase-contrast image achieves magnification; in a mammography unit dedicated to phase-contrast imaging, the magnification ratio is 1.75. When using an X-ray tube with a 0.1-mm focal spot, it appears that the penumbra in magnification blurs both projected images and the phase contrast, which generates an edge effect. However, where the sampling pitch of the CR plate is 43.75 microm, the blur stretches the width of the phase contrast so that unit pixels in the detector can capture it. Note that the width of an ideal phase contrast using an X-ray point source results in a phase contrast too narrow for detection with CR. In addition to phase contrast improving image quality, a re-scaling effect increases image sharpness in magnification. Further, image noise induced by magnification can be reduced during printing to photothermographic dry film by demagnifying the digital output image to the original image size. After demagnification by 1/1.75 from 43.75 microm in image acquisition, a 25-microm pixel size of the output image is obtained so that the spatial resolution matches that of conventional screen-film mammography. In this paper, such technical advantages of magnification in digital phase-contrast mammography are reviewed, and the image quality of phase-contrast images is discussed in light of diagnostic requirements in detecting breast cancer.
Similar articles
-
[X-ray phase imaging using a X-ray tube with a small focal spot -improvement of image quality in mammography-].Igaku Butsuri. 2002;22(1):21-9. Igaku Butsuri. 2002. PMID: 12766293 Review. Japanese.
-
A comparison between objective and subjective image quality measurements for a full field digital mammography system.Phys Med Biol. 2006 May 21;51(10):2441-63. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/51/10/006. Epub 2006 Apr 26. Phys Med Biol. 2006. PMID: 16675862
-
Imaging properties of digital magnification radiography.Med Phys. 2006 Apr;33(4):984-96. doi: 10.1118/1.2174133. Med Phys. 2006. PMID: 16696475
-
Image quality performance of liquid crystal display systems: influence of display resolution, magnification and window settings on contrast-detail detection.Eur J Radiol. 2006 Jun;58(3):471-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2005.12.016. Epub 2006 Jan 25. Eur J Radiol. 2006. PMID: 16442770
-
Digital mammography.Radiol Clin North Am. 2004 Sep;42(5):871-84, vi. doi: 10.1016/j.rcl.2004.06.004. Radiol Clin North Am. 2004. PMID: 15337422 Review.
Cited by
-
Objective measurements of image quality in synchrotron radiation phase-contrast imaging versus digital mammography.Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2016 Feb;11(2):181-8. doi: 10.1007/s11548-015-1237-7. Epub 2015 Jun 20. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2016. PMID: 26092659
-
A review of breast tomosynthesis. Part II. Image reconstruction, processing and analysis, and advanced applications.Med Phys. 2013 Jan;40(1):014302. doi: 10.1118/1.4770281. Med Phys. 2013. PMID: 23298127 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Development and preclinical evaluation of a patient-specific high energy x-ray phase sensitive breast tomosynthesis system.Med Phys. 2021 May;48(5):2511-2520. doi: 10.1002/mp.14743. Epub 2021 Apr 1. Med Phys. 2021. PMID: 33523479 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical