Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2008 Sep;36(3):267-72.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2008.04.016. Epub 2008 Jun 27.

Multidimensional characterization of carotid artery stenosis using CT imaging: a comparison with ultrasound grading and peak flow measurement

J van Prehn  1 , B E Muhs, B Pramanik, M Ollenschleger, C B Rockman, N S Cayne, M A Adelman, G R Jacobowitz, T S Maldonado
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Multidimensional characterization of carotid artery stenosis using CT imaging: a comparison with ultrasound grading and peak flow measurement

J van Prehn et al. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2008 Sep.

Abstract

Purpose: Clinical decision making for carotid surgery depends largely upon stenosis grade. While digital subtraction angiography remains the gold standard for stenosis grading, many physicians use less invasive modalities. The purpose of this study was to compare the results of multidimensional Computed tomography (CTA) with ultrasound (US) grading and peak flow velocity (PSV).

Methods: 37 stenosed carotid arteries were studied retrospectively in 36 consecutive patients. US grading and PSV were compared to multidimensional CTA analysis (diameter, area and volumetric measurements), performed by a medical software company. Calculations of stenosis percentage on CTA were made using the NASCET and ECST methodology. Diameter measurements were also performed by a neuroradiologist.

Results: All CTA diameter, area and volume measurements had only modest correlation with PSV (r<0.5) and ultrasound grading (p<0.5). There was concordant classification of stenosis grades in only 40-60% of cases. CTA diameter, area and volume measurements had good correlation (0.69<r<0.87) with one another using ECST methodology. Using NASCET methodology on CTA, correlation between diameter and area was insignificant (r=0.32). CTA volumetric analysis with the NASCET method yielded 27 negative stenosis grades. Repeatability coefficient for selecting the normal distal ICA 20 mm more distally was 20% for diameter and 43% for area. CTA diameter interobserver repeatability coefficients were 22.9% (NASCET) and 17.8% (ECST) and 0.7 mm (lumen) and 1.9 mm (vessel).

Conclusions: All CTA measurements showed moderate correlation with both ultrasound grading and PSV. Selection of the level of the normal distal ICA influences the NASCET calculations and can produce discrepant stenosis grades. Multidimensional CTA analysis seems to have no additional value for stenosis grading, but provides other useful anatomic information.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources