Optimal carotid duplex velocity criteria for defining the severity of carotid in-stent restenosis
- PMID: 18586444
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.04.004
Optimal carotid duplex velocity criteria for defining the severity of carotid in-stent restenosis
Abstract
Background: The optimal duplex ultrasound (DUS) velocity criteria to determine in-stent carotid restenosis are controversial. We previously reported the optimal DUS velocities for >or=30% in-stent restenosis. This prospective study will further define the optimal velocities in detecting various severities of in-stent restenosis: >or=30%, >or=50%, and 80% to 99%.
Methods: The analysis included 144 patients who underwent carotid artery stenting as a part of clinical trials. All patients had completion arteriograms and underwent postoperative carotid DUS imaging, which was repeated at 1 month and every 6 months thereafter. Patients with peak systolic velocities (PSVs) of the internal carotid artery (ICA) of >or=130 cm/s underwent carotid computed tomography (CT)/angiogram. The PSVs and end-diastolic velocities of the ICA and common carotid artery (CCA) and the PSV of the ICA/CCA ratios were recorded. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis was used to determine the optimal velocity criteria for the diagnosis of >or=30, >or=50, and >or=80% restenosis.
Results: The mean follow-up was 20 months (range, 1-78 months). Available for analysis were 215 pairs of imaging (DUS vs CTA/angiography) studies. The accuracy of CTA vs carotid arteriogram was confirmed in a subset of 22 patients (kappa = 0.81). The ROC analysis demonstrated that an ICA PSV of >or=154 cm/s was optimal for >or=30% stenosis with a sensitivity of 99%, specificity of 89%, positive-predictive value (PPV) of 96%, negative-predictive value (NPV) of 97%, and overall accuracy (OA) of 96%. An ICA EDV of 42 cm/s had sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and OA in detecting >or=30% stenosis of 86%, 62%, 87%, 60%, and 80%, respectively. An ICA PSV of >or=224 cm/s was optimal for >50% stenosis with a sensitivity of 99%, specificity of 90%, PPV of 99%, NPV of 90%, and OA of 98%. An ICA EDV of 88 cm/s had sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and OA in detecting >or=50% stenosis of 96%, 100%, 100%, 100%, 53%, and 96%. An ICA/CCA ratio of 3.439 had sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and OA in detecting >or=50% stenosis of 96%, 100%, 100%, 100%, 58%, and 96%, respectively. An ICA PSV of >or=325 cm/s was optimal for >80% stenosis with a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 99%, PPV of 100%, NPV of 88%, and OA of 99%. An ICA EDV of 119 cm/sec had sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and OA in detecting >or=80% stenosis of 99%, 100%, 100%, 100%, 75%, and 99%, respectively. The PSV of the stented artery was a better predictor for in-stent restenosis than the end-diastolic velocity or ICA/CCA ratio.
Conclusion: The optimal DUS velocity criteria for in-stent restenosis of >or=30%, >or=50%, and >or=80% were the PSVs of 154, 224, and 325 cm/s, respectively.
Comment in
-
Commentary. Optimal carotid duplex velocity criteria for defining the severity of carotid in-stent restenosis.Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther. 2009 Sep;21(3):200-1. doi: 10.1177/1531003509337030. Epub 2009 Jul 17. Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther. 2009. PMID: 19617245 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Duplex ultrasound velocity criteria for the stented carotid artery.J Vasc Surg. 2008 Jan;47(1):63-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.09.038. J Vasc Surg. 2008. PMID: 18178455
-
Carotid duplex velocity criteria revisited for the diagnosis of carotid in-stent restenosis.Vascular. 2007 May-Jun;15(3):119-25. doi: 10.2310/6670.2007.00030. Vascular. 2007. PMID: 17573016
-
Proposed duplex velocity criteria for carotid restenosis following carotid endarterectomy with patch closure.J Vasc Surg. 2009 Aug;50(2):286-91, 291.e1-2; discussion 291. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.01.065. J Vasc Surg. 2009. PMID: 19631861 Clinical Trial.
-
Percutaneous Treatment of Recurrent In-Stent Restenosis of Carotid Artery Stenting: A Case Report and State-of-the-Art Review.Am J Case Rep. 2015 Aug 21;16:558-62. doi: 10.12659/AJCR.894198. Am J Case Rep. 2015. PMID: 26294661 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Follow-up after carotid endarterectomy and stenting: What to look for and why.Semin Vasc Surg. 2020 Dec;33(3-4):47-53. doi: 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2020.11.001. Epub 2020 Nov 21. Semin Vasc Surg. 2020. PMID: 33308595 Review.
Cited by
-
In-stent restenosis after interventional treatment of carotid artery stenoses: a long-term follow-up of a single center cohort.Clin Res Cardiol. 2017 Jul;106(7):493-500. doi: 10.1007/s00392-017-1078-1. Epub 2017 Feb 8. Clin Res Cardiol. 2017. PMID: 28180940
-
Diagnostic vascular ultrasonography with the help of color Doppler and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography.Ultrasonography. 2016 Oct;35(4):289-301. doi: 10.14366/usg.16027. Epub 2016 Aug 12. Ultrasonography. 2016. PMID: 27669962 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Accuracy of duplex ultrasonography in estimation of severity of peripheral vascular disease.Int J Angiol. 2013 Sep;22(3):155-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1336830. Int J Angiol. 2013. PMID: 24436603 Free PMC article.
-
Prevention of in-stent restenosis with drug-eluting balloons in patients with postirradiated carotid stenosis accepting percutaneous angioplasty and stenting.J Neurointerv Surg. 2023 Dec 19;16(1):73-80. doi: 10.1136/jnis-2022-019957. J Neurointerv Surg. 2023. PMID: 36914246 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Transcranial doppler sonography is not a valid diagnostic tool for detection of basilar artery stenosis or in-stent restenosis: a retrospective diagnostic study.BMC Neurol. 2017 May 11;17(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12883-017-0872-8. BMC Neurol. 2017. PMID: 28490351 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous