Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Jun 27:9:32.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2172-9-32.

Ex vivo recovery and activation of dysfunctional, anergic, monocyte-derived dendritic cells from patients with operable breast cancer: critical role of IFN-alpha

Affiliations

Ex vivo recovery and activation of dysfunctional, anergic, monocyte-derived dendritic cells from patients with operable breast cancer: critical role of IFN-alpha

Sukchai Satthaporn et al. BMC Immunol. .

Abstract

Background: Dendritic cells (DCs) play a crucial role in initiating effective cell-mediated immune responses, but are dysfunctional and anergic in breast cancer. Reversal of this dysfunction and establishment of optimal DC function is a key prerequisite for the induction of effective anti-cancer immune responses.

Results: Peripheral blood DCs (PBDCs) and lymph node DCs (LNDCs) generated in vitro from adherent cultures of peripheral blood monocytes (PBMs) and lymph node monocytes (LNMs), respectively, using the 4 cytokine conditioned medium (CCM) (GM-CSF+IL-4+TNF-alpha+IFN-alpha) or 3 CCM (GM-CSF+IL-4+TNF-alpha) demonstrated a significantly higher degree of recovery and functional capacity in a mixed lymphocyte DC reaction (MLDCR, p < 0.001), expressed significantly higher levels of HLA-DR, CD86, compared with 2 CCM (GM-CSF+IL-4) or medium alone generated DCs from PBMs and LNMs (p < 0.001). The PBDCs generated with 3 CCM or 4 CCM showed a significantly (p < 0.001) enhanced macropinocytotic capability (dextran particles) and induced increased production and secretion of interleukin-12p40 (IL-12p40) in vitro (p < 0.001), compared with PBDCs generated from monocytes using 2 CCM or medium alone. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulation of PBDCs generated with 4 CCM demonstrated enhanced secretion of IL-6 but not IL-12p70, compared with control DCs unstimulated with LPS (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Dysfunctional and anergic PBDCs and LNDCs from patients with operable breast cancer can be optimally reversed by ex vivo culturing of precursor adherent monocytes using a 4 CCM containing IFN-alpha. Maximal immunophenotypic recovery and functional reactivation of DCs is seen in the presence of IFN-alpha. However, 4 CCM containing IFN-alpha generated-PBDCs, do not produce and secrete IL-12p70 in vitro.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) Percentage of PBDCs (from patients with operable breast cancer) expressing HLA-DR, CD 86 and CD 40: Statistically significant increase in expression of HLA-DR was observed in the 3 and 4 CCM (cytokine conditioned medium) compared with 2 CCM generated DCs and medium only generated DCs (p < 0.001, ANOVA). Similarly, significant increase in expression of CD86 was observed in the 3 or 4 CCM compared with 2 CCM (cytokine conditioned medium) generated DCs or medium only generated DCs (p < 0.001, ANOVA). However, CD40 expression was increased (p < 0.01, ANOVA) in the 3 or 4 CCM generated DCs compared with medium only DCs. (B) Percentage of LNDCs (from patients with operable breast cancer) expressing HLA-DR, CD 86 and CD 40: Statistically significant increase in expression of HLA-DR, CD 86 and CD40 on LNDCs cultured with 3 and 4 CCM compared with medium only generated DCs from patients with breast cancer (p < 0.01, ANOVA). (C) Percentage of PBDCs (healthy donor) expressing HLA-DR, CD 86 and CD 40: Significant increase in expression of HLA-DR was observed in the 3 and 4 CCM (cytokine conditioned medium) compared with 2 CCM generated DCs and medium only generated DCs (p < 0.001, ANOVA). However, significant (p < 0.01, ANOVA) increase in expression of CD86 was observed in the 3 or 4 CCM (cytokine conditioned medium) compared with medium only generated DCs. Similarly, CD40 expression was significantly increased in 3 or 4 CCM generated DCs compared with medium only generated DCs. Results shown in 1 A, B and C are represented as mean ± standard deviation (error bars) are from ten different patients or healthy donors. Lineage-negative cells were selectively gated and analyzed in all conditions.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Phenotypic profile of PBDCS (A) and LNDCs (B) generated with medium alone (no cytokine), 2, 3 and 4 CCM: Representative maximal fluorescent intensity from flow cytometry of the increasing expression of HLA-DR, CD 40 and CD 86 in different in vitro conditions. (Lineage negative cells were gated and analyzed only)
Figure 3
Figure 3
Phagocytosis (dextran uptake) for DCs generated in the presence of medium only (A), 2 CCM (B), 3 CCM (C) and 4 CCM (D): Representative maximal fluorescent intensity of mannose receptors in putative Ag uptake by incubation with Cascade Blue-conjugated dextran in different in vitro conditions (at 4°C and 37°C). Lineage negative cells were gated and analyzed only. 0
Figure 4
Figure 4
Box plot showing mannose receptors in putative antigen uptake by incubation with Cascade Blue – conjugated dextran in different in vitro conditions of PBDCs generated from 10 different patients: Percentage of uptake by cells of Cascade Blue conjugated-dextran were calculated from Lin-cells (Lin-cells were gated and analyzed). PBDCs grown in 4 CCM (GM-CSF+IL-4+TNF-α+IFN-α) or 3CCM (GM-CSF+IL-4+TNF-α) compared with medium only generated PBDCs or 2 CCM (GM-CSF+IL-4), both demonstrated significantly higher levels of dextran uptake (*** p < 0.001, ANOVA). Horizontal bars represent mean value for each category. Data shown are median (line), mean (dot), interquartile range (box) and maximum and minimum values (whiskers).
Figure 5
Figure 5
(A): Differential production of IL-10p40 and IL-12: Activation/maturation of PBDCs by the 3 and 4 CCM (cytokine conditioned media) leads to significantly increased production and secretion of the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-12 p40, compared with medium only (*** p < 0.001, ANOVA) and 2 CCM generated DCs (***p < 0.001, ANOVA). In contrast, 3 and 4 CCM generated DCs produced and secreted significantly less inhibitory cytokine IL-10 compared with 2 CCM generated PBDCs (***p < 0.001, ANOVA). Cell free supernatants were obtained on day 7 of culture. Cytokine concentrations were determined by ELISA. The results shown are from ten different patients and are represented as mean ± standard deviation. Error bars represent standard deviations. (B): Production of IL-12p40 by PBDCs from healthy donors (controls): The amounts of cytokines in the samples were measured using ELISA. The levels of IL-10 and IL-12 p40 from PBDCs generated from monocytes cultured using all 4 cytokines (4 CCM) from 10 normal healthy donors were evaluated. The mean level of IL-12 p40 was 72.95 ± 4.47, which was significantly (p < 0.01, Student t-test) lower compared with 4 CCM generated PBDCs from breast cancer patients (Mean = 262 ± 15). However, IL-10 was not detectable in the supernatants and hence not shown in this Figure. (C): Cytokine production by PBDCs generated with 4 CCM from patients with operable breast cancer following stimulation with LPS (1 μg/300μl): IL-12p70 was undetectable before and after LPS stimulation and hence not shown in this Figure. IL-6 production and secretion was significantly increased after LPS stimulation (*** p < 0.001, Student t-test). NS: Not significant.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Increased blastogenesis in the MLDCR: The stimulatory capacity of DCs.(PB:peripheral blood, LN:lymph node) was estimated from the incorporation of 3H-thymidine (shown as cpm). During the last 18 h on the 5th day of in vitro culture containing T cells (5 × 104 cells/well) from a normal volunteer and irradiated DCs (2.5 × 103 cells/well) from patients with operable breast cancer (PBDCs and LNDCs). DC:T cell ratio was 1:20. LNM and PBM-derived DCs with 3 and 4 CCM milieu showed a significantly increased allogeneic stimulatory capacity compared with 2 CCM (***p < 0.001, ANOVA) and medium only generated DCs (***p < 0.001, ANOVA). Results shown (mean ± standard deviation) are from ten different patients. Error bars represent standard deviations.

References

    1. Lenahan C, Avigan D. Dendritic cell defects in patients with cancer: mechanisms and significance.[comment] Breast Cancer Research. 2006;8:101. doi: 10.1186/bcr1375. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pinzon-Charry A, Maxwell T, Lopez JA. Dendritic cell dysfunction in cancer: a mechanism for immunosuppression. Immunology & Cell Biology. 2005;83:451–461. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1711.2005.01371.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Garcia-Lora A, Algarra I, Garrido F. MHC class I antigens, immune surveillance, and tumor immune escape. Journal of Cellular Physiology. 2003;195:346–355. doi: 10.1002/jcp.10290. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gilboa E. DC-based cancer vaccines. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2007;117:1195–1203. doi: 10.1172/JCI31205. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kim R, Emi M, Tanabe K, Arihiro K. Immunobiology of the sentinel lymph node and its potential role for antitumour immunity. Lancet Oncology. 2006;7:1006–1016. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70975-5. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms