Post-Essure hysterosalpingography compliance in a clinic population
- PMID: 18588851
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2008.03.004
Post-Essure hysterosalpingography compliance in a clinic population
Abstract
Study objective: To determine the follow-up rate for post-Essure hysterosalpingography (HSG) in a non-study, general clinic population in an urban environment.
Design: Retrospective chart review (Canadian Task Force classification II-2).
Setting: University teaching hospital.
Patients: Eighty-three University Health Center (UHC) patients who underwent attempted placement of the Essure permanent birth control device at the ambulatory surgery center at Hutzel Women's Hospital from January 2003 through June 2007.
Intervention: Hysteroscopic placement of the Essure permanent birth control device.
Measurements and main results: Placement of the Essure permanent birth control device was attempted in 83 patients, of which 79 were successfully completed (95.2%). Of the 79 patients, 10 underwent post-Essure HSG (12.7%). HSG was performed 3 to 6 months after placement of the Essure device. Bilateral tubal occlusion was documented in all 10 patients.
Conclusion: Despite preoperative and postoperative counseling, the follow-up rate for post-Essure HSG for this clinic population was only 12.7%. For those in whom HSG was performed, bilateral tubal occlusion was confirmed in all. Steps or approaches to promote compliance with postprocedural confirmation of tubal occlusion should be utilized to improve future follow-up rates.
Similar articles
-
Improving hysterosalpingogram confirmatory test follow-up after Essure hysteroscopic sterilization.Contraception. 2010 Jun;81(6):520-4. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2010.01.019. Epub 2010 Mar 4. Contraception. 2010. PMID: 20472120
-
Trends in sterilization since the introduction of Essure hysteroscopic sterilization.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2009 Jan-Feb;16(1):22-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2008.08.017. Epub 2008 Nov 8. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2009. PMID: 18996773
-
Placement of a permanent birth control device at a university medical center.J Reprod Med. 2009 Apr;54(4):218-22. J Reprod Med. 2009. PMID: 19438163
-
Essure: hysteroscopic sterilization.J Midwifery Womens Health. 2006 Nov-Dec;51(6):510-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2006.04.002. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2006. PMID: 17081943 Review.
-
Transcervical sterilization.Semin Reprod Med. 2010 Mar;28(2):103-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1248134. Epub 2010 Mar 29. Semin Reprod Med. 2010. PMID: 20352559 Review.
Cited by
-
Efficacy, safety, and patient acceptability of the Essure™ procedure.Patient Prefer Adherence. 2011 Apr 28;5:207-12. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S12400. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2011. PMID: 21573052 Free PMC article.
-
Transcervical sterilization: a comparison of essure(r) permanent birth control system and adiana(r) permanent contraception system.Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Spring;2(2):84-92. Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2009. PMID: 19609402 Free PMC article.
-
Reliability of laparoscopic compared with hysteroscopic sterilization at 1 year: a decision analysis.Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Aug;118(2 Pt 1):273-279. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318224d4d2. Obstet Gynecol. 2011. PMID: 21775842 Free PMC article.
-
Hysterosalpingogram: an essential examination following Essure hysteroscopic sterilisation.Br J Radiol. 2011 Sep;84(1005):805-12. doi: 10.1259/bjr/95330860. Epub 2010 Dec 1. Br J Radiol. 2011. PMID: 21123309 Free PMC article.
-
Improving Rates of Post-Essure Hysterosalpingography in an Urban Population Using Electronic Tracking Reminders.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017 Feb;24(2):305-308. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.10.019. Epub 2016 Nov 17. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017. PMID: 27867049 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical