Economic evaluation of uterine artery embolization versus hysterectomy in the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids: results from the randomized EMMY trial
- PMID: 18589314
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2008.03.001
Economic evaluation of uterine artery embolization versus hysterectomy in the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids: results from the randomized EMMY trial
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate whether uterine artery embolization (UAE) is a cost-effective alternative to hysterectomy for patients with symptomatic uterine fibroids, the authors performed an economic evaluation alongside the multicenter randomized EMMY (EMbolization versus hysterectoMY) trial.
Materials and methods: Between February 2002 and February 2004, 177 patients were randomized to undergo UAE (n = 88) or hysterectomy (n = 89) and followed up until 24 months after initial treatment allocation. Conditional on the equivalence of clinical outcome, a cost minimization analysis was performed according to the intention to treat principle. Costs included health care costs inside and outside the hospital as well as costs related to absence from work (societal perspective). Cumulative standardized costs were estimated as volumes multiplied with prices. The nonparametric bootstrap method was used to quantify differences in mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) costs between the strategies.
Results: In total, 81 patients underwent UAE and 75 underwent hysterectomy. In the UAE group, 19 patients (23%) underwent secondary hysterectomies. The mean total costs per patient in the UAE group were significantly lower than those in the hysterectomy group ($11,626 vs $18,563; mean difference, -$6,936 [-37%], 95% CI: -$9,548, $4,281). The direct medical in-hospital costs were significantly lower in the UAE group: $6,688 vs $8,313 (mean difference, -$1,624 [-20%], 95% CI: -$2,605, -$586). Direct medical out-of-hospital and direct nonmedical costs were low in both groups (mean cost difference, $156 in favor of hysterectomy). The costs related to absence from work differed significantly between the treatment strategies in favor of UAE (mean difference, -$5,453; 95% CI: -$7,718, -$3,107). The costs of absence from work accounted for 79% of the difference in total costs.
Conclusions: The 24-month cumulative cost of UAE is lower than that of hysterectomy. From a societal economic perspective, UAE is the superior treatment strategy in women with symptomatic uterine fibroids.
Similar articles
-
Uterine artery embolization, hysterectomy, or myomectomy for symptomatic uterine fibroids: a cost-utility analysis.Fertil Steril. 2009 Feb;91(2):580-8. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.11.078. Epub 2008 Mar 4. Fertil Steril. 2009. PMID: 18295216
-
Cost-effectiveness of uterine artery embolization and hysterectomy for uterine fibroids.Radiology. 2004 Jan;230(1):207-13. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2301021482. Radiology. 2004. PMID: 14695395 Review.
-
Payer costs in patients undergoing uterine artery embolization, hysterectomy, or myomectomy for treatment of uterine fibroids.J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2007 Oct;18(10):1207-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2007.07.007. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2007. PMID: 17911509
-
Pain and return to daily activities after uterine artery embolization and hysterectomy in the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids: results from the randomized EMMY trial.Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2006 Mar-Apr;29(2):179-87. doi: 10.1007/s00270-005-0195-9. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2006. PMID: 16447002 Clinical Trial.
-
The economic impact of uterine fibroids in the United States: a summary of published estimates.J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2005 Oct;14(8):692-703. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2005.14.692. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2005. PMID: 16232101 Review.
Cited by
-
Uterine artery embolization for symptomatic uterine fibroids.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Dec 26;2014(12):CD005073. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005073.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014. PMID: 25541260 Free PMC article.
-
Can measurement of apparent diffusion coefficient before treatment predict the response to uterine artery embolization for adenomyosis?Eur Radiol. 2015 May;25(5):1303-9. doi: 10.1007/s00330-014-3504-3. Epub 2014 Dec 7. Eur Radiol. 2015. PMID: 25481638
-
Prediction of early response to uterine arterial embolisation of adenomyosis: value of T2 signal intensity ratio of adenomyosis.Eur Radiol. 2012 Sep;22(9):2044-9. doi: 10.1007/s00330-012-2436-z. Epub 2012 Apr 17. Eur Radiol. 2012. PMID: 22527376 Clinical Trial.
-
Short-term outcomes of uterine artery embolization for urgent or emergent abnormal uterine bleeding.Abdom Radiol (NY). 2023 Jul;48(7):2443-2448. doi: 10.1007/s00261-023-03928-8. Epub 2023 May 5. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2023. PMID: 37145314
-
Assessing the risk of rapid fibroid growth in patients with asymptomatic solitary uterine myoma using a multivariate prediction model.Ann Transl Med. 2021 Mar;9(5):370. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-4559. Ann Transl Med. 2021. PMID: 33842591 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical