Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2008 May;6(1):9-16.
doi: 10.3121/cmr.2008.788.

Applying case definition criteria to irritable bowel syndrome

Affiliations
Review

Applying case definition criteria to irritable bowel syndrome

Steven H Yale et al. Clin Med Res. 2008 May.

Abstract

Objective: The quality of documentation of signs and symptoms and validation of the diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) according to case definition criteria of Manning, Rome I and Rome II in an office setting has not been previously described. We sought to identify and validate cases of IBS based on the Manning, Rome I and Rome II diagnostic criteria in a rural practice setting.

Setting: Marshfield Epidemiologic Study Area (MESA) Central consisting of 14 ZIP codes in central Wisconsin, USA.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study involved 890 patients with the diagnostic codes 564.1 for irritable bowel syndrome and 306.4 spastic colon-psychogenic who had presented to the practice from 1993-2003. Duration, frequency, concordance and intensity of symptoms based on case definitions of IBS were abstracted from the medical records.

Results: During the study period, 890 incident cases of IBS were identified. Only 404 met one or more of the three diagnostic criteria, 340 (84%) met only the Manning criteria, 35 (10%) met only Manning and Rome I criteria, 4 (1%) met both Manning and Rome II criteria, and 25 (6%) met Manning and Rome I and Rome II criteria. Age adjusted incidence rates per 100,000 person-years for validated IBS cases during the observational period were 87 to 170 by Manning (lower confidence interval [CI]: 57-127, upper CI: 116-213), 8 to 34 (lower CI: 0-14, upper CI: 16-53) for Rome I and 3 to 16 (lower CI: 0-3, upper CI: 8-28) for Rome II. Comparison of Rome I and Rome II showed moderate concordance (kappa statistic = 0.51; 95% CI: 0.39-0.64).

Conclusions: Only a small percentage of IBS cases with assigned diagnostic codes met case definition criteria for IBS. There were low concordance rates among the three diagnostic criteria applied.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Selection of cases based on clinicians’ documentation in the medical record and validation by the IBS diagnostic criteria.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Frequency and overlap of IBS cases based on the Manning, Rome I, and Rome II diagnostic criteria.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Age-adjusted incidence rate of validated definitive IBS diagnoses.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Age-adjusted incidence rate of validated definitive IBS diagnoses in males.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Age-adjusted incidence rate of validated definitive IBS diagnoses in females.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Smith RC, Greenbaum DS, Vancouver JB, Henry RC, Reinhart MA, Greenbaum RB, Dean HA, Mayle JE. Gender differences in Manning criteria in the irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology 1991;100:591–595. - PubMed
    1. Camilleri M, Heading RC, Thompson WG. Clinical perspectives, mechanisms, diagnosis and management of irritable bowel syndrome. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2002;16:1407–1430. - PubMed
    1. Ringel Y, Sperber AD, Drossman DA. Irritable bowel syndrome. Annu Rev Med 2001;52:319–338. - PubMed
    1. Drossman DA. The Rome criteria process: diagnosis and legitimization of irritable bowel syndrome. Am J Gastroenterol 1999;94:2803–2807. - PubMed
    1. Manning AP, Thompson WG, Heaton KW, Morris AF. Towards positive diagnosis of the irritable bowel. Br Med J 1978;2:653–654. - PMC - PubMed