Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Jul 1;68(13):5282-90.
doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-0037.

Improved therapeutic results by pretargeted radioimmunotherapy of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma with a new recombinant, trivalent, anti-CD20, bispecific antibody

Affiliations

Improved therapeutic results by pretargeted radioimmunotherapy of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma with a new recombinant, trivalent, anti-CD20, bispecific antibody

Robert M Sharkey et al. Cancer Res. .

Abstract

We examined whether a pretargeting method using a new recombinant anti-CD20 bispecific antibody (bsMAb) followed by (90)Y-1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-N,N',N'',N'''-tetraacetic acid ((90)Y-DOTA)-peptide could reduce hematologic toxicity yet improve therapeutic responses compared with conventional (90)Y-anti-CD20 IgG and a chemically conjugated bsMAb. TF4, a humanized, tri-Fab bsMAb with two Fabs binding CD20 and one Fab binding histamine-succinyl-glycine (HSG), developed by the dock and lock (DNL) method, was tested in nude mice with Ramos B-cell lymphomas. Optimal pretargeting required a 29-h interval between TF4 and (90)Y-DOTA-HSG, and 20-fold more moles of TF4. TF4 cleared more rapidly from the blood than anti-CD20 IgG, with early processing in the liver, spleen, and kidney. At 24 h, TF4 improved tumor uptake of (111)In-HSG-peptide 2.6-fold [13% versus 5% injected dose per gram (ID/g)] and enhanced tumor to blood ratios >45-fold (770 versus 17), compared with an anti-CD20 Fab x anti-HSG Fab chemical conjugate, and by 1.6-fold (9.0% versus 5.6% ID/g) and 1,600-fold (522 versus 0.32), respectively, compared with radiolabeled anti-CD20 IgG. A severe (>or=90%) and prolonged reduction of WBCs was observed at the maximum dose of (90)Y-anti-CD20 IgG, whereas pretargeting resulted in a <or=60% transient drop. TF4 pretargeting resulted in highly significant improvement in survival, curing 33% to 90% of the animals, even at relatively low doses, whereas most tumors progressed quickly without cures with (90)Y-anti-CD20 IgG. These results indicate an improved therapeutic index with pretargeted radioimmunotherapy (RAIT) using a DNL-constructed tri-Fab, bsMAb, compared with conventional therapy with directly radiolabeled antibody or with a chemically conjugated bsMAb. These encouraging results prompt testing these constructs for pretargeting RAIT in patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Diagram depicts the structure of tri-Fab made by DNL method, showing DDD and AD domains bearing the anti-CD20 Fabs and the anti-HSG Fab, respectively. IMP-288's structure shows the single DOTA moiety (red), 2 HSG moieties (blue) and the D-amino acids (black) that compose this hapten-peptide.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Evaluation of optimal pretargeting conditions. Tumor-bearing nude mice (N = 5 per determination) were administered increasing amounts of TF4 (0.125 nmoles to 1.0 nmoles). At 29 or 39 h later, 0.025 nmoles (15 μCi) of 111In-IMP-288 was given. Doses are expressed as the TF4 to IMP-288 mole ratio, ranging from 5:1 to 40:1. Values represent means ± SD. Tumor weights averaged 1.0 g for the animals studied at the 39-h interval and ∼2.0 g for the animals examined at the 29-h interval.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Comparison of direct and pretargeting methods. The left side-panels show the average biological data (% ID/g; mean ± SD, n = 5) for tumor and normal tissue uptake, and the right-side panels show the effective data (μCi/g; error bars not given because they were contained with the symbol). The effective data assume that 0.7 and 0.15 mCi of the pretargeting 90Y-IMP-288 and 90Y-IgG, respectively, were given. (see Supplementary Table S1 in for listing of means ± SD for % ID/g and tumor/nontumor ratios for the pretargeting and IgG data.)
Figure 4
Figure 4
Kaplan-Meier survival curves for six separate studies summarized in Table 2. Survival was based on the time required for the tumor to reach the size of ≥3.0 cm3. Wilcoxon two-sample analysis of tumor quadrupling time can be found in Supplementary Data Table S2.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Becker YT, Samaniego-Picota M, Sollinger HW. The emerging role of rituximab in organ transplantation. Transpl Int. 2006;19:621–8. - PubMed
    1. Cheson BD. Monoclonal antibody therapy for B-cell malignancies. Semin Oncol. 2006;33:S2–14. - PubMed
    1. Eisenberg R, Albert D. B-cell targeted therapies in rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus. Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol. 2006;2:20–7. - PubMed
    1. Jacobs SA, Foon KA. The expanding role of rituximab and radioimmunotherapy in the treatment of B-cell lymphomas. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2007;7:1749–62. - PubMed
    1. Martin P, Leonard JP. Targeted therapies for non-Hodgkin lymphoma: rationally designed combinations. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma. 2007;7 5:S192–8. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms