Erythromycin vs metoclopramide for facilitating gastric emptying and tolerance to intragastric nutrition in critically ill patients
- PMID: 18596312
- DOI: 10.1177/0148607108319803
Erythromycin vs metoclopramide for facilitating gastric emptying and tolerance to intragastric nutrition in critically ill patients
Abstract
Background: The purpose of this study is to evaluate erythromycin vs metoclopramide for facilitating gastric emptying and tolerance to intragastric enteral nutrition (EN).
Methods: Twenty critically ill patients with a gastric residual >150 mL while receiving EN were randomized to receive 4 intravenous doses of erythromycin 250 mg or metoclopramide 10 mg, each administered every 6 hours. Acetaminophen 975 mg was administered enterally at baseline and after the fourth dose. Acetaminophen peak plasma concentration (Cmax), concentration at 60 minutes (C(60)), time to Cmax (Tmax), and area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 60 minutes (AUC(0-60)) were determined. Residual volumes and feeding rates were recorded.
Results: Compared with baseline, erythromycin increased Cmax (9.5 +/- 6.1 mg/L to 17.7 +/- 11.9 mg/L, P < .01), C(60) (5.4 +/- 3.5 mg/L to 12.9 +/- 7.6 mg/L, P < .01), and AUC(0-60) (3.5 +/- 3.0 mg.h/L to 12.5 +/- 8.7 mg.h/L, P < .01), while metoclopramide increased only AUC(0-60) (4.4 +/- 2.8 mg.h/L to 9.5 +/- 3.8 mg.hr/L, P < .05). Neither agent significantly reduced Tmax. Both erythromycin and metoclopramide reduced residual volumes (122 +/- 48 mL to 36 +/- 48 mL, P < .01, and 103 +/- 88 mL to 21 +/- 23 mL, P < .05, respectively) and allowed increased feeding rates (17 +/- 23 mL/h to 45 +/- 21 mL/h, P < .05, and 14 +/- 17 mL/h to 44 +/- 22 mL/h, P < .05, respectively).
Conclusions: Both agents facilitate tolerance to intragastric EN, but erythromycin may be more effective than metoclopramide for enhancing gastric motility.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of cisapride and metoclopramide for facilitating gastric emptying and improving tolerance to intragastric enteral nutrition in critically III, mechanically ventilated adults.Clin Ther. 2001 Nov;23(11):1855-66. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(00)89081-5. Clin Ther. 2001. PMID: 11768837 Clinical Trial.
-
Sequential single doses of cisapride, erythromycin, and metoclopramide in critically ill patients intolerant to enteral nutrition: a randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study.Crit Care Med. 2000 Feb;28(2):438-44. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200002000-00025. Crit Care Med. 2000. PMID: 10708180 Clinical Trial.
-
Gastric motility function in critically ill patients tolerant vs intolerant to gastric nutrition.JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2008 Jan-Feb;32(1):45-50. doi: 10.1177/014860710803200145. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2008. PMID: 18165446
-
Intolerance to intragastric enteral nutrition in critically ill patients: complications and management.Pharmacotherapy. 2000 Dec;20(12):1486-98. doi: 10.1592/phco.20.19.1486.34853. Pharmacotherapy. 2000. PMID: 11130221 Review.
-
Practicalities of nutrition support in the intensive care unit: the usefulness of gastric residual volume and prokinetic agents with enteral nutrition.Nutrition. 2011 May;27(5):509-12. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2010.10.010. Epub 2011 Feb 4. Nutrition. 2011. PMID: 21295944 Review.
Cited by
-
The efficacy and safety of prokinetic agents in critically ill patients receiving enteral nutrition: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.Crit Care. 2016 Aug 15;20(1):259. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1441-z. Crit Care. 2016. PMID: 27527069 Free PMC article.
-
The diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography over manual aspiration for gastric reserve volume estimation in critically ill patients.Acute Crit Care. 2023 Feb;38(1):134-141. doi: 10.4266/acc.2022.00955. Epub 2023 Feb 22. Acute Crit Care. 2023. PMID: 36935542 Free PMC article.
-
Common Pathophysiological Mechanisms and Treatment of Diabetic Gastroparesis.J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2024 Apr 30;30(2):143-155. doi: 10.5056/jnm23100. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2024. PMID: 38576367 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Enteral tolerance in critically ill patients.J Intensive Care. 2019 May 7;7:30. doi: 10.1186/s40560-019-0378-0. eCollection 2019. J Intensive Care. 2019. PMID: 31086671 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Measurement of Gastric Residual Volume via Ultrasound after Receiving Intravenous Ondansetron, Metoclopramide, and Neostigmine in Critically Ill Patients: A Double-Blind Clinical Trial.Tanaffos. 2021 Apr;20(4):312-318. Tanaffos. 2021. PMID: 36267931 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials