Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Aug;36(8):2316-21.
doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181810378.

Glucose variability and mortality in patients with sepsis

Affiliations

Glucose variability and mortality in patients with sepsis

Naeem A Ali et al. Crit Care Med. 2008 Aug.

Abstract

Objective: Treatment and prevention of hyperglycemia has been advocated for subjects with sepsis. Glucose variability, rather than the glucose level, has also been shown to be an important factor associated with in-hospital mortality, in general, critically ill patients. Our objective was to determine the association between glucose variability and hospital mortality in septic patients and the expression of glucose variability that best reflects this risk.

Design: Retrospective, single-center cohort study.

Setting: Academic, tertiary care hospital.

Patients: Adult subjects hospitalized for >1 day, with a diagnosis of sepsis were included.

Interventions: None.

Measurements: Glucose variability was calculated for all subjects as the average and standard deviation of glucose, the mean amplitude of glycemic excursions, and the glycemic lability index. Hospital mortality was the primary outcome variable. Logistic regression was used to determine the odds of hospital death in relation to measures of glucose variability after adjustment for important covariates.

Main results: Of the methods used to measure glucose variability, the glycemic lability index had the best discrimination for mortality (area under the curve = 0.67, p < 0.001). After adjustment for confounders, including the number of organ failures and the occurrence of hypoglycemia, there was a significant interaction between glycemic lability index and average glucose level, and the odds of hospital mortality. Higher glycemic lability index was not independently associated with mortality among subjects with average glucose levels above the median for the cohort. However, subjects with increased glycemic lability index, but lower average glucose values had almost five-fold increased odds of hospital mortality (odds ratio = 4.73, 95% confidence interval = 2.6-8.7) compared with those with lower glycemic lability index.

Conclusions: Glucose variability is independently associated with hospital mortality in septic patients. Strategies to reduce glucose variability should be studied to determine whether they improve the outcomes of septic patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have not disclosed any potential conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Cohort selection criteria. Patient records were selected from all inpatient records from 2005 based on discharge diagnoses. Numbers of subjects and reasons for exclusion are reported. The 21 subjects listed as having “limited glucose data” had only one value for glucose recorded during their hospitalization, thus making the calculation of variability impossible. LOS, length of stay.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Observed mortality for the whole sepsis cohort by glucose measure. All hospital measures of glucose were used to generate glycemic lability index (GLI). From this the expected mortality was generated across the range of observed values of glucose. Each decile contains approximately 125 subjects.

Comment in

References

    1. Brun-Buisson C, Meshaka P, Pinton P, et al. EPISEPSIS: A reappraisal of the epidemiology and outcome of severe sepsis in French intensive care units. Intensive Care Med. 2004;30:527–529. - PubMed
    1. Angus DC, Linde-Zwirble WT, Lidicker J, et al. Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: Analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care. Crit Care Med. 2001;29:1303–1310. - PubMed
    1. Wang HE, Shapiro NI, Angus DC, et al. National estimates of severe sepsis in United States emergency departments. Crit Care Med. 2007;35:1928–1936. - PubMed
    1. Marik PE, Raghavan M. Stress-hyperglycemia, insulin and immunomodulation in sepsis. Intensive Care Med. 2004;30:748–756. - PubMed
    1. Russell JA. Management of sepsis. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:1699–1713. - PubMed

Publication types