Can an electronic device with a single cuff be accurate in a wide range of arm size? Validation of the Visomat Comfort 20/40 device for home blood pressure monitoring
- PMID: 18596720
- DOI: 10.1038/jhh.2008.70
Can an electronic device with a single cuff be accurate in a wide range of arm size? Validation of the Visomat Comfort 20/40 device for home blood pressure monitoring
Abstract
An appropriate cuff according to the individual's arm circumference is recommended with all blood pressure (BP) monitors. An electronic device for home monitoring has been developed (Visomat Comfort 20/40) that estimates the individual's arm circumference by measuring the cuff filing volume and makes an adjustment of measured BP taking into account the estimated arm circumference. Thus the manufacturer recommends the use of a single cuff for arm circumference 23-43 cm. The device accuracy was assessed using the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol. Simultaneous BP measurements were obtained in 33 adults by two observers (connected mercury sphygmomanometers) four times, sequentially with three measurements taken using the tested device. Absolute device-observer BP differences were classified into < or =5, < or =10 and < or =15 mm Hg zones. For each participant the number of measurements with a difference < or =5 mm Hg was calculated. The device produced 60/89/97 measurements within 5/10/15 mm Hg respectively for systolic BP, and 72/97/98 for diastolic. Twenty-three subjects had at least two of their systolic BP differences < or =5 mm Hg and three had no differences < or =5 mm Hg (for diastolic 27 and 1, respectively). Mean device-observer BP difference (systolic/diastolic) was 3.7 +/- 5.6/-1.5 +/- 4.7 mm Hg (4.7 +/- 4.9/ - 1.7 +/- 4.3 in arm circumference 23-29 cm [39 readings] and 3.1 +/- 5.9/-1.4 +/- 5.0 in arm 30-34 cm [60 readings], P=NS). In conclusion, the device fulfils the International Protocol requirements and can be recommended for clinical use. Interestingly, the device was accurate using a single cuff in a wide range of arm circumference (23-34 cm). This study provides no information about the device accuracy in larger arms.
Similar articles
-
Are there really differences between home and daytime ambulatory blood pressure? Comparison using a novel dual-mode ambulatory and home monitor.J Hum Hypertens. 2010 Mar;24(3):207-12. doi: 10.1038/jhh.2009.60. Epub 2009 Jul 16. J Hum Hypertens. 2010. PMID: 19609285 Clinical Trial.
-
Validation of the OMRON M7 (HEM-780-E) blood pressure measuring device in a population requiring large cuff use according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension.Blood Press Monit. 2007 Jun;12(3):173-8. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e3280b08367. Blood Press Monit. 2007. PMID: 17496467
-
Validation of the visomat comfort eco blood pressure measuring device according to the International Protocol.Blood Press Monit. 2009 Aug;14(4):178-80. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e32832d429c. Blood Press Monit. 2009. PMID: 19494767
-
Adequacy of validation of wide-range cuffs used with home blood pressure monitors: a systematic review.Blood Press Monit. 2018 Oct;23(5):219-224. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000344. Blood Press Monit. 2018. PMID: 30074520
-
A tool for reliable self-home blood pressure monitoring designed according to the European Society of Hypertension recommendations: the Microlife WatchBP Home monitor.Blood Press Monit. 2007 Apr;12(2):127-31. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e32809efa38. Blood Press Monit. 2007. PMID: 17353657 Review.
Cited by
-
A Call to Regulate Manufacture and Marketing of Blood Pressure Devices and Cuffs: A Position Statement From the World Hypertension League, International Society of Hypertension and Supporting Hypertension Organizations.J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2016 May;18(5):378-80. doi: 10.1111/jch.12782. Epub 2016 Feb 8. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2016. PMID: 26852890 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Cuff challenges in blood pressure measurement.J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2018 Jul;20(7):1100-1103. doi: 10.1111/jch.13301. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2018. PMID: 30003699 Free PMC article.
-
Challenges in blood pressure measurement in children with obesity: focus on the cuff.Pediatr Nephrol. 2025 Feb 5. doi: 10.1007/s00467-025-06678-5. Online ahead of print. Pediatr Nephrol. 2025. PMID: 39907759 Review.
-
Evaluation of the Omron MX3 Plus monitor for blood pressure measurement in adolescents.Eur J Pediatr. 2009 Nov;168(11):1349-54. doi: 10.1007/s00431-009-0936-x. Epub 2009 Feb 17. Eur J Pediatr. 2009. PMID: 19221789
-
Techniques for self-measurement of blood pressure: limitations and needs for future research.J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2012 Mar;14(3):139-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2011.00586.x. Epub 2012 Jan 23. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2012. PMID: 22372772 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous