Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2008:119:197-215; discussion 215-6.

In search of the holy grail of antifungal therapy

Affiliations
Review

In search of the holy grail of antifungal therapy

Stanley W Chapman et al. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 2008.

Abstract

The ideal antifungal agent remains an elusive goal for treatment of life-threatening systemic fungal infections. Such an agent would have broad antifungal activity, low rates of resistance, flexible routes of administration, few associated adverse events, and limited drug-drug interactions. Only three of the seven classes of antifungal agents currently available are suitable for treatment of systemic infection: the polyenes, the azoles, and the echinocandins. None match all the characteristics of an ideal agent, the Holy Grail of antifungal therapy. Academia and industry need to collaborate in the search for new lead antifungal compounds using traditional screening methods as well as the new pharmacogenomics methods. Enhancing efficacy and reducing toxicity of the currently available therapeutic agents is also another important avenue of study. As an example, the Mycosis Research Center at the University of Mississippi Medical Center has identified pyogenic polyenes in commercial preparations of amphotericin B deoxycholate which correlate with infusion related toxicities. A highly purified formulation of amphotericin B appears promising, with a better therapeutic index compared to its parent compound as evidenced by results of in vitro and in vivo studies reviewed in this presentation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Timeline of development of antifungal agents.

References

    1. Kwon-Chong K. J., Bennett J. E. Medical Mycology. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger; 1992.
    1. Marr D. A., Crippa F., Leisenring W., Hoyle M., Boeckh M., Balajee S. A., Nichols W. G., Musher B., Corey L. Itraconazole versus fluconazole for prevention of fungal infections in patients receiving allogeneic stem cell transplants. Blood. 2004;103:1527–1533. - PubMed
    1. Ullmann A. J., Lipton J. H., Vesole D. H., Chandrasekar P., Langston A., Tarantolo S. R., Greinix H., Morais de Azevedo W., Reddy V, Boparai N., Pedicone L., Patino H., Durrant S. Posaconazole or fluconazole for prophylaxis in severe graft-versus-host disease. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:335–347. - PubMed
    1. Viscoli C., Girmenia C., Marinus A., Collette L., Martino P., Vandercam B., Doyen C., Lebeau B., Spence D., Krcmery V. Candidemia in cancer patients: A prospective, multicenter surveillance study by the Invasive Fungal Infection Group (IFIG) of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Clin Infect Dis. 1999;28:1071–1079. - PubMed
    1. Cornely O, Maertens J, Winston D, Perfect J., Ullmann A., Walsh T., Helfgott D., Holowiecki J., Stockelberg D., Goh Y.T., Petrini M., Hardalo C., Suresh R., Angulo-Gonzalez D. Posaconazole vs fluconazole or itraconazole prophylaxis in patients with neutropenia. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:348–359. - PubMed

MeSH terms