On-pump beating heart coronary surgery for high risk patients requiring emergency multiple coronary artery bypass grafting
- PMID: 18597673
- PMCID: PMC2474599
- DOI: 10.1186/1749-8090-3-38
On-pump beating heart coronary surgery for high risk patients requiring emergency multiple coronary artery bypass grafting
Abstract
Background: Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) with aortic cross-clamping and cardioplegic arrest remains the method of choice for patients requiring standard myocardial revascularization. Therefore, very high-risk patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome, unstable angina, onset of cardiac decompensation and requiring emergency multiple myocardial revascularization, can have a poor outcome. The on-pump beating heart technique can reduce the mortality and the morbidity in such a selected group of patients and this report describes our clinical experience.
Methods: Out of 290 patients operated for CABG from January 2005 to January 2006, 25 (8.6%) selected high-risk patients suffering from life threatening coronary syndrome (mean age 69 +/- 7 years) and requiring emergency multiple myocardial revascularization, underwent on-pump beating heart surgery. The mean pre-operative left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) was 27 +/- 8%. The majority of them (88%) suffered of tri-vessel coronary disease and 6 (24%) had a left main stump disease. Nine patients (35%) were on severe cardiac failure and seven among them (28%) received a pre-operative intra-aortic balloon pump. The pre-operative EuroScore rate was equal or above 8 in 18 patients (73%).
Results: All patients underwent on-pump-beating heart coronary revascularization. The mean number of graft/patient was 2.9 +/- 0.6 and the internal mammary artery was used in 23 patients (92%). The mean CPB time was 84 +/- 19 minutes. Two patients died during the recovery stay in the intensive care unit, and there were no postoperative myocardial infarctions between the survivors. Eight patients suffered of transitorily renal failure and 1 patient developed a sternal wound infection. The mean hospital stay was 12 +/- 7 days. The follow-up was complete for all 23 patients survived at surgery and the mean follow-up time was 14 +/- 5 months. One patient died during the follow-up for cardiac arrest and 2 patients required an implantable cardiac defibrillator. One year after surgery they all had a standard trans-thoracic echocardiogram showing a mean LVEF rate of 36 +/- 11.8%.
Conclusion: Standard on-pump arrested heart coronary surgery has higher mortality and morbidity in emergencies. The on-pump beating heart myocardial revascularization seems to be a valid alternative for the restricted and selected cohort of patients suffering from life threatening coronary syndrome and requiring multiple emergency CABG.
Similar articles
-
On-pump beating-heart coronary artery bypass grafting after acute myocardial infarction has lower mortality and morbidity.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008 Mar;135(3):521-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.10.006. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008. PMID: 18329463 Clinical Trial.
-
Emergency coronary artery bypass graft surgery for acute coronary syndrome: beating heart versus conventional cardioplegic cardiac arrest strategies.Circulation. 2006 Jul 4;114(1 Suppl):I477-85. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.001545. Circulation. 2006. PMID: 16820622
-
Aortic and mitral valve surgery on the beating heart is lowering cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross clamp time.Heart Surg Forum. 2002;5(2):182-6. Heart Surg Forum. 2002. PMID: 12125670
-
On-pump beating-heart coronary artery bypass grafting in high-risk patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.J Card Surg. 2020 Aug;35(8):1958-1978. doi: 10.1111/jocs.14780. Epub 2020 Jul 9. J Card Surg. 2020. PMID: 32643847
-
How revascularization on the beating heart with cardiopulmonary bypass compares to off-pump? A meta-analysis of observational studies.Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2016 Jan;22(1):63-71. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivv291. Epub 2015 Oct 26. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2016. PMID: 26503012 Review.
Cited by
-
Effect of different surgical type of coronary artery bypass grafting on kidney injury: A propensity score analysis.Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Nov;96(45):e8395. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008395. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017. PMID: 29137024 Free PMC article.
-
[Coronary artery bypass surgery for the treatment of acute coronary syndromes].Herz. 2010 Mar;35(2):70-8. doi: 10.1007/s00059-010-3327-1. Herz. 2010. PMID: 20376640 Review. German.
-
A multidisciplinary approach to unplanned conversion from off-pump to on-pump beating heart coronary artery revascularization in patients with compromised left ventricular function.Crit Care Res Pract. 2014;2014:348021. doi: 10.1155/2014/348021. Epub 2014 Nov 12. Crit Care Res Pract. 2014. PMID: 25478216 Free PMC article.
-
On-Pump Beating/Non-Beating CABG in Stable Angina Have Similar Outcomes.Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Mar-Apr;33(2):183-188. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2017-0161. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2018. PMID: 29898149 Free PMC article.
-
Management of Traumatic Coronary Artery Injuries: Advantages of Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass.Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2010 Aug;36(4):380-4. doi: 10.1007/s00068-009-9063-7. Epub 2009 Sep 17. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2010. PMID: 26816044
References
-
- Kirklin JK. Prospectors for understanding and eliminating the deleterious effects of cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg. 1991;51:529–531. - PubMed
-
- Christenson JT, Maurice J, Simonet F, Bloch A, Fournet PC, Velebit V, Schmuziger M. Effects of low ventricular ejection fractions on the outcome of primary coronary bypass grafting in end-stage coronary artery disease. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 1995;36:45–51. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical