Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2008 Jun;47(2):192-6.
doi: 10.1016/s1028-4559(08)60079-0.

Pre-labor rupture of membranes at term in patients with an unfavorable cervix: active versus conservative management

Affiliations
Free article
Comparative Study

Pre-labor rupture of membranes at term in patients with an unfavorable cervix: active versus conservative management

Aqueela Ayaz et al. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jun.
Free article

Abstract

Objective: To compare the safety and efficacy of conservative management of pre-labor rupture of membranes (PROM) at term in patients with an unfavorable cervix, with active treatment using oral misoprostol.

Materials and methods: This quasi-experimental study was conducted between June 1, 2004 and November 30, 2004 at Bahawal Victoria Hospital, Bahawalpur, Pakistan. Eighty-four multigravid women (parity, < 5) at > or = 37 weeks' gestation and with unfavorable cervices were divided equally between group S (study) and group C (conservative). Group S was given 50 micrograms of oral misoprostol every 4 hours for a maximum of four doses, while group C was managed conservatively. The intervals between PROM and significant uterine contractions and delivery, the mode of delivery, and maternal and fetal/neonatal complications were the main outcome measures.

Results: The intervals between PROM and the onset of uterine contractions and delivery were lower in group S than group C (9.6 vs. 14.8 hours; p < 0.001) and (11.6 vs. 17 hours; p < 0.001), respectively. Fewer women delivered abdominally within 24 hours of PROM in group S than in group C (5% vs. 24%; p < 0.05). Induction failure in group S was less than conservative management failure in group C (10% vs. 60%; p < 0.001). The maternal complication rate was less in group S than in group C (7% vs. 14%; p > 0.05), but the fetal/neonatal complication rate was similar in both groups (5%).

Conclusion: Oral misoprostol (50 micrograms) is safe and effective for cervical ripening and labor induction in patients with PROM and an unfavorable cervix.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources