Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008:2008:594868.
doi: 10.1155/2008/594868.

Preclinical evidence for the benefits of penile rehabilitation therapy following nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy

Affiliations

Preclinical evidence for the benefits of penile rehabilitation therapy following nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy

M Albersen et al. Adv Urol. 2008.

Abstract

Erectile dysfunction following radical prostatectomy remains a frequent problem despite the development of nerve-sparing techniques. This erectile dysfunction is believed to be neurogenic, enhanced by hypoxia-induced structural changes which result in additional veno-occlusive dysfunction. Recently, daily use of intracavernous vasoactive substances and oral use of PDE5-inhibitors have been clinically studied for treatment of postprostatectomy erectile dysfunction. Since these studies showed benefits of "penile rehabilitation therapy," these effects have been studied in a preclinical setting. We reviewed experimental literature on erectile tissue preserving and neuroregenerative treatment strategies, and found that preservation of the erectile tissue by the use of intracavernous nitric oxide donors or vasoactive substances, oral PDE5-inhibitors, and hyperbaric oxygen therapy improved erectile function by antifibrotic effects and preservation of smooth muscle. Furthermore, neuroregenerative strategies using neuroimmunophilin ligands, neurotrophins, growth factors, and stem cell therapy show improved erectile function by preservation of NOS-containing nerve fibers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Heidenreich A, Aus G, Bolla M, et al. EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. European Urology. 2008;53(1):68–80. - PubMed
    1. Walsh PC, Donker PJ. Impotence following radical prostatectomy: insight into etiology and prevention. Journal of Urology. 1982;128(3):492–497. - PubMed
    1. Walsh PC. Anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy. In: Walsh PC, Retik AB, Vaughan ED, Wein AJ, editors. Campbell's Urology. 7th edition. Philadelphia, Pa, USA: WB Saunders; 1997. pp. 2565–2588.
    1. Van Der Aa F, Joniau S, De Ridder D, Van Poppel H. Potency after unilateral nerve sparing surgery: a report on functional and oncological results of unilateral nerve sparing surgery. Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases. 2003;6(1):61–65. - PubMed
    1. Kundu SD, Roehl KA, Eggener SE, Antenor JAV, Han M, Catalona WJ. Potency, continence and complications in 3,477 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomies. Journal of Urology. 2004;172(6, part 1):2227–2231. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources