Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2008 Sep;18(9):1840-56.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-008-0970-5. Epub 2008 Jul 8.

Solitary pulmonary nodules and masses: a meta-analysis of the diagnostic utility of alternative imaging tests

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Solitary pulmonary nodules and masses: a meta-analysis of the diagnostic utility of alternative imaging tests

Paul Cronin et al. Eur Radiol. 2008 Sep.

Abstract

The purpose was to assess the clinical utility of diagnostic tests for identifying malignancy within a solitary pulmonary nodule (SPN), and to create a nomogram or "look-up" table using clinical data and non-invasive radiology (positive) test results to estimate post-test probability of malignancy. Studies that examined computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography (PET) and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) for the evaluation of SPN. Two reviewers independently abstracted data and assessed study quality. Study-specific and overall positive likelihood ratios (LRs) for each diagnostic test confirming a diagnosis of malignancy and negative LR for each diagnostic test excluding a diagnosis of malignancy within an SPN were calculated. Forty-four of 242 articles were included. Positive LRs for diagnostic tests were: CT 3.91 (95% confidence interval 2.42, 5.40), MRI 4.57 (3.03, 6.1), PET 5.44 (3.56, 7.32) and SPECT 5.16 (4.03, 6.30). Negative LRs were: CT 0.10 (0.03, 0.16), MRI 0.08 (0.03, 0.12), PET 0.06 (0.02, 0.09) and SPECT 0.06 (0.04, 0.08). Differences in performance for all tests were negligible; therefore, the clinician may confidently use any of the four tests presented in further evaluating an SPN. Given the low cost and prevalence of the technology, SPECT appears to be the leading choice for additional testing in SPN evaluation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1988 Feb 6;296(6619):391-2 - PubMed
    1. Dis Mon. 1991 May;37(5):271-318 - PubMed
    1. Epidemiol Rev. 1992;14:154-76 - PubMed
    1. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2005 Jan-Feb;29(1):13-9 - PubMed
    1. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Jan;188(1):57-68 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources