Robotic suturing: technique and benefit in advanced laparoscopic surgery
- PMID: 18609002
- DOI: 10.1080/13645700802103381
Robotic suturing: technique and benefit in advanced laparoscopic surgery
Abstract
Suturing is one of the main tasks in advanced laparoscopic surgery, but limited degrees of freedom, 2D vision, fulcrum and pivoting effect make it difficult to perform. Robotic systems provide corresponding solutions as three-dimensional (3D) view, intuitive motion and additional degrees of freedom. This review evaluates these benefits for their impact on suturing in experimental and clinical studies. The Medline database was searched for "robot*, telemanipulat* and laparoscop*". A total of 1150 references were found and further limited to "suturing" for experimental evaluation, finding 89 references. All references were considered for information on robotic suturing in advanced laparoscopy. Further references were obtained through cross-referencing the bibliography cited in each work. In experimental studies current robotic systems have proven their superior suturing capabilities compared to conventional laparoscopic techniques, mainly attributed to 3D visualization and full seven degrees of freedom. In clinical studies these benefits have not yet been sufficiently reproduced. Robotic systems have to prove the benefits shown in experimental studies for suturing tasks in clinical applications. Robotic devices shorten the learning curve of laparoscopic procedures. Further clinical trials focusing on anastomosis time are needed to assess this question.
Similar articles
-
A comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and hand-sewn intestinal sutured anastomoses performed by residents.Am J Surg. 2007 Mar;193(3):349-55; discussion 355. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.09.018. Am J Surg. 2007. PMID: 17320533
-
Learning curves of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery: an experimental study evaluating skill acquisition of robot-assisted laparoscopic tasks compared with conventional laparoscopic tasks in inexperienced users.Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2007 Jun;17(3):171-4. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31805b8346. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2007. PMID: 17581459
-
Status of robotic assistance--a less traumatic and more accurate minimally invasive surgery?Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2012 Mar;397(3):333-41. doi: 10.1007/s00423-011-0859-7. Epub 2011 Oct 29. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2012. PMID: 22038293 Review.
-
A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic assisted suturing performance by experts and novices.Surgery. 2010 Jun;147(6):830-9. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2009.11.002. Epub 2009 Dec 31. Surgery. 2010. PMID: 20045162
-
Robotics, telesurgery and telementoring--their position in modern urological laparoscopy.Arch Esp Urol. 2002 Jul-Aug;55(6):610-28. Arch Esp Urol. 2002. PMID: 12224160 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison of the learning curves and frustration level in performing laparoscopic and robotic training skills by experts and novices.Int Urol Nephrol. 2015 Jul;47(7):1075-84. doi: 10.1007/s11255-015-0991-3. Epub 2015 Apr 26. Int Urol Nephrol. 2015. PMID: 25913053
-
Current status of robotic surgery.Indian J Surg. 2012 Jun;74(3):242-7. doi: 10.1007/s12262-012-0595-4. Epub 2012 Jul 5. Indian J Surg. 2012. PMID: 23730051 Free PMC article.
-
Robotic liver resection: technique and results of 30 consecutive procedures.Surg Endosc. 2012 Aug;26(8):2247-58. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2168-9. Epub 2012 Feb 4. Surg Endosc. 2012. PMID: 22311301
-
Endoscopic robotic suturing: The way forward.Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2019 Sep-Oct;25(5):272-276. doi: 10.4103/sjg.SJG_12_19. Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2019. PMID: 30900610 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Impact of Training on Three-Dimensional versus Two-Dimensional Laparoscopic Systems on Acquisition of Laparoscopic Skills in Novices: A Prospective Comparative Pilot Study.Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:4197693. doi: 10.1155/2016/4197693. Epub 2016 Nov 22. Biomed Res Int. 2016. PMID: 27995141 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources