Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2008 Jul;69(4):589-93.
doi: 10.15288/jsad.2008.69.589.

Five-year outcomes of alcohol-dependent persons treated with motivational enhancement

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Five-year outcomes of alcohol-dependent persons treated with motivational enhancement

Simon J Adamson et al. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2008 Jul.

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the superior treatment effect of motivational enhancement therapy (MET) previously demonstrated at 6 months was sustained at a 5-year posttreatment follow-up.

Method: Patients with mild to moderate alcohol dependence had completed a trial in which all patients were assessed, attended a brief feedback session, and were randomized to four sessions of MET, nondirective reflective listening, or no further counseling. The primary drinking outcome was unequivocal heavy drinking (UHD), defined as drinking 10 or more standard drinks on six or more occasions over a 6-month period. At the 6-month follow-up, 108 of 122 patients agreed to a further follow-up interview.

Results: Seventy-seven patients were successfully followed for a mean (SD) of 58 (14) months after the completion of treatment. Although the group as a whole had continued to improve, with rates of UHD reduced from 51 % at 6 months to 25% at 5 years, there was no difference by treatment group in drinking for UHD or a range of lower drinking thresholds.

Conclusions: Although 5-year outcomes were indistinguishable among the three treatment groups, this was the result of patients in the comparison conditions catching up to the drinking gains of MET patients rather than a deterioration in drinking for MET patients. Individuals allocated to receive MET achieved a greater reduction sooner than either of the comparison treatment conditions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms