Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 May;45(2):363-86.
doi: 10.1353/dem.0.0010.

Population change and farm dependence: temporal and spatial variation in the U.S. Great Plains, 1900-2000

Affiliations

Population change and farm dependence: temporal and spatial variation in the U.S. Great Plains, 1900-2000

Katherine J Curtis White. Demography. 2008 May.

Abstract

I investigate the relationship between county population change and farm dependence in the Great Plains region during the twentieth century, using spatial data analysis techniques. This research is rooted in a long-standing sociological and demographic interest in population responses to economic transitions and informs the theoretical understanding of urbanization processes. Using census and environmental data, the analysis challenges earlier assertions of a simple transition in the relationship between farm dependence and population change that accompanied modern technological advancements, namely tractors (the mechanization thesis). Rather than observing the proposed positive-to-negative shift, study results show a negative association throughout the pre- and post-mechanization periods. Partial support is found if the thesis is revised to consider the relationship between population change and the change in farm dependence rather than the level of farm dependence. Findings show mixed support for an alternative argument that nonfarm industries moderate the influence of farm dependence (the industry complex thesis). In contrast to earlier applications of the thesis, industrial relations in the Great Plains context are characterized by specialization rather than cooperation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Spatial Distribution of Population Change in the Great Plains for 1900–1910, 1940–1950, and 1990–2000
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Spatial Distribution of Farm Population for All the Great Plains Counties in 1900
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Estimated Percentage Change in Population for Great Plains Counties With Average Farm Dependence, by Level of Manufacturing in the Decades With a Statistically Significant Association

References

    1. Adcock DP. Proceedings of the Great Plains Agricultural Council. Bismarck, ND: Great Plains Agricultural Council; 1995. “The Dynamics of the People and the Economy of the Great Plains.”; pp. 75–84.
    1. Albrecht DE. “Agricultural Dependence and the Population Turnaround: Evidence From the Great Plains”. Journal of the Community Development Society. 1986;17(1):1–15.
    1. Albrecht DE. “The Renewal of Population Loss in the Nonmetropolitan Great Plains”. Rural Sociology. 1993;58:233–46.
    1. Anselin L. Spatial Econometrics, Methods and Models. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic; 1988.
    1. Beale CL. “People on the Land.”. In: Ford TR, editor. Rural USA: Persistence and Change. Ames: Iowa State University Press; 1978. pp. 37–54.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources