Noninvasive ventilation in acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema
- PMID: 18614781
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0707992
Noninvasive ventilation in acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema
Abstract
Background: Noninvasive ventilation (continuous positive airway pressure [CPAP] or noninvasive intermittent positive-pressure ventilation [NIPPV]) appears to be of benefit in the immediate treatment of patients with acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema and may reduce mortality. We conducted a study to determine whether noninvasive ventilation reduces mortality and whether there are important differences in outcome associated with the method of treatment (CPAP or NIPPV).
Methods: In a multicenter, open, prospective, randomized, controlled trial, patients were assigned to standard oxygen therapy, CPAP (5 to 15 cm of water), or NIPPV (inspiratory pressure, 8 to 20 cm of water; expiratory pressure, 4 to 10 cm of water). The primary end point for the comparison between noninvasive ventilation and standard oxygen therapy was death within 7 days after the initiation of treatment, and the primary end point for the comparison between NIPPV and CPAP was death or intubation within 7 days.
Results: A total of 1069 patients (mean [+/-SD] age, 77.7+/-9.7 years; female sex, 56.9%) were assigned to standard oxygen therapy (367 patients), CPAP (346 patients), or NIPPV (356 patients). There was no significant difference in 7-day mortality between patients receiving standard oxygen therapy (9.8%) and those undergoing noninvasive ventilation (9.5%, P=0.87). There was no significant difference in the combined end point of death or intubation within 7 days between the two groups of patients undergoing noninvasive ventilation (11.7% for CPAP and 11.1% for NIPPV, P=0.81). As compared with standard oxygen therapy, noninvasive ventilation was associated with greater mean improvements at 1 hour after the beginning of treatment in patient-reported dyspnea (treatment difference, 0.7 on a visual-analogue scale ranging from 1 to 10; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.2 to 1.3; P=0.008), heart rate (treatment difference, 4 beats per minute; 95% CI, 1 to 6; P=0.004), acidosis (treatment difference, pH 0.03; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.04; P<0.001), and hypercapnia (treatment difference, 0.7 kPa [5.2 mm Hg]; 95% CI, 0.4 to 0.9; P<0.001). There were no treatment-related adverse events.
Conclusions: In patients with acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema, noninvasive ventilation induces a more rapid improvement in respiratory distress and metabolic disturbance than does standard oxygen therapy but has no effect on short-term mortality. (Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN07448447.)
2008 Massachusetts Medical Society
Comment in
-
Noninvasive ventilation in acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema.N Engl J Med. 2008 Nov 6;359(19):2068; author reply 2069. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc081649. N Engl J Med. 2008. PMID: 18987377 No abstract available.
-
Noninvasive ventilation improved dyspnea but did not reduce short-term mortality in acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema.ACP J Club. 2008 Dec 16;149(6):9. ACP J Club. 2008. PMID: 19071875 No abstract available.
-
The role of noninvasive ventilation in acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema.Crit Care. 2010;14(2):303. doi: 10.1186/cc8889. Epub 2010 Mar 12. Crit Care. 2010. PMID: 20236476 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials