[Therapy and prognosis of bacterial arthritis: a retrospective analysis]

Abstract

Antibiotic therapy and immediate drainage of the infected joint are established practice in the treatment of septic arthritis. The best method of drainage (repeated puncture, arthroscopy or surgical discharge) remains controversial. We analyze 34 patients with septic arthritis admitted to our hospital from 1984 to 1988. The pathogen was Staphylococcus aureus in 19 cases (56%), streptococcus in 6 (18%), pneumococcus in 2 (6%), other bacteria in (9%) and unknown in 4 (12%). In 62% the infection was blood-borne. The knee was affected in 12 cases (35%) and the shoulder in 10 (30%). A preceding joint puncture was the main source of infection. In 24 patients (70%) the initial joint drainage was by repeated puncture, while in 10 cases (30%) surgical drainage was the initial treatment. In 11 of the 24 patients initially treated by repeated puncture, surgical drainage was needed in the course of treatment because of persistent local infection of the joint. In only 13 (39%) was "medical" treatment alone effective. 5 patients died (14.7), 3 (8.8%) due to the infection. All deaths occurred in the "medical" group. 21 patients were asked about symptoms in the affected joint. In 71% there were no problems or only minimal ones, while in 29% there were distinct problems. 5 of the 6 patients with severe symptoms had been treated by repeated puncture. We conclude that surgical drainage of an infected joint is prescribed too rarely in departments of rheumatology and internal medicine. Arthroscopic or surgical drainage is indicated in cases of coxarthritis, omarthritis, in cases where symptoms last longer than 7 days and in patients with severe sepsis.