Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2008 Jul;65(7):963-7.
doi: 10.1001/archneur.65.7.963.

Detecting dementia with the mini-mental state examination in highly educated individuals

Sid E O'Bryant  1 , Joy D Humphreys, Glenn E Smith, Robert J Ivnik, Neill R Graff-Radford, Ronald C Petersen, John A Lucas
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Detecting dementia with the mini-mental state examination in highly educated individuals

Sid E O'Bryant et al. Arch Neurol. 2008 Jul.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the utility of Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores in detecting cognitive dysfunction in a sample of highly educated individuals.

Design: Archival data were reviewed on 4248 participants enrolled in the Mayo Clinic Alzheimer Disease Research Center and Alzheimer Disease Patient Registry.

Patients: A total of 1141 primarily white (93%) individuals with 16 or more years of self-reported education were identified. These included 307 (164 men and 143 women) patients with dementia (any type), 176 (106 men and 70 women) patients with mild cognitive impairment, and 658 (242 men and 416 women) control participants without dementia.

Setting: Mayo Clinic Alzheimer Disease Research Center and Alzheimer Disease Patient Registry cohort.

Main outcome measures: Diagnostic accuracy estimates (sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive power) of MMSE cut scores in detecting cognitive dysfunction.

Results: In this sample of highly educated, largely white older adults, the standard MMSE cut score of 24 (23 or below) yielded a sensitivity of 0.66, a specificity of 0.99, and an overall correct classification rate of 89% in detecting dementia. A cut score of up to 27 (26 or below) resulted in an optimal balance of sensitivity and specificity (0.89 and 0.91, respectively) with an overall correct classification rate of 90%. In a cognitively impaired group (dementia and mild cognitive impairment), a cut score of 27 (sensitivity, 0.69; specificity, 0.91) or 28 (sensitivity and specificity, 0.78) might be more appropriate.

Conclusion: Older patients with a college education who present with complaints of cognitive decline (reported by themselves or others) and score less than 27 on the MMSE are at a greater risk of being diagnosed with dementia and should be referred for a comprehensive dementia evaluation, including formal neuropsychological testing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Receiver operating characteristic curve for Mini-Mental State Examination scores (indicated by numbers within figure) in detecting dementia.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research. 1975;12(3):189–198. - PubMed
    1. Strauss E, Sherman EMS, Spreen O. A Compendium of Neuropsychological Tests: Administration, norms, and commentary. 3rd ed Oxford University Press; Oxford: 2006.
    1. Harvan JR, Cotter V. An evaluation of dementia screening in the primary care setting. Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners. 2006;18(8):351–360. - PubMed
    1. Grut M, Fratiglioni L, Viitanen M, Winblad B. Accuracy of the Mini-Mental Status Examination as a screening test for dementia in a Swedish elderly population. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica. 1993;87(4):312–317. - PubMed
    1. Mungas D, Marshall SC, Weldon M, Haan M, Reed BR. Age and education correction of Mini-Mental State Examination for English and Spanish-speaking elderly. Neurology. 1996;46(3):700–706. - PubMed

Publication types