Informed consent in an antiretroviral trial in Nigeria
- PMID: 18630217
- DOI: 10.20529/IJME.2007.009
Informed consent in an antiretroviral trial in Nigeria
Abstract
We examined the process of informed consent in an antiretroviral trial in Nigeria. A semi-structured questionnaire was administered to 88 out of 180 people enrolled in the trial. This covered all aspects of the information disclosed in the leaflet of the antiretroviral trial. We found that 75 (85 per cent) of the respondents knew that the purpose of the research was to test a new drug and 13 (14 per cent) believed that they were receiving free treatment for HIV. Participants understood certain aspects of the research, especially the benefits and duration. Their understanding of the trial's risks and their right to refuse to participate and to withdraw was low. Their level of understanding was significantly related to age but not to gender, marriage, education, religion, employment and occupation. Signed informed consent is not a guarantee that participants have understood the information given to them and therefore made a voluntary decision to participate. Researchers should make sure that the process of obtaining informed consent achieves the desired outcome. This is especially important in the developing world where access to health care is limited, potential participants are poor and literacy levels are low.
Similar articles
-
Factors related to volunteer comprehension of informed consent for a clinical trial.Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2006 Sep;37(5):996-1004. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2006. PMID: 17333746
-
Improving comprehension of informed consent.Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Mar;60(3):294-300. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.10.009. Epub 2006 Jan 20. Patient Educ Couns. 2006. PMID: 16427762
-
Understanding the decisions of cancer clinical trial participants to enter research studies: factors associated with informed consent, patient satisfaction, and decisional regret.Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Oct;63(1-2):104-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.09.006. Epub 2005 Oct 19. Patient Educ Couns. 2006. PMID: 16242898
-
[Ethics of research: the freedom to withdraw].Bull Soc Pathol Exot. 2008 Apr;101(2):98-101. Bull Soc Pathol Exot. 2008. PMID: 18543700 Review. French.
-
Improvement of informed consent and the quality of consent documents.Lancet Oncol. 2008 May;9(5):485-93. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70128-1. Lancet Oncol. 2008. PMID: 18452859 Review.
Cited by
-
Tailoring information provision and consent processes to research contexts: the value of rapid assessments.J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2012 Feb;7(1):37-52. doi: 10.1525/jer.2012.7.1.37. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2012. PMID: 22378133 Free PMC article.
-
I'm positive, but i'm negative: Competing Voices in Informed Consent and Implications for HIV vaccine trials.J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2015 Apr;10(2):151-6. doi: 10.1177/1556264615575509. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2015. PMID: 25819758 Free PMC article.
-
Participants' understanding of informed consent in clinical trials: A systematic review and updated meta-analysis.PLoS One. 2024 Jan 2;19(1):e0295784. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295784. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. Retraction in: PLoS One. 2025 Jun 3;20(6):e0325694. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325694. PMID: 38166097 Free PMC article. Retracted.
-
Participants' understanding of informed consent in clinical trials over three decades: systematic review and meta-analysis.Bull World Health Organ. 2015 Mar 1;93(3):186-98H. doi: 10.2471/BLT.14.141390. Epub 2015 Jan 22. Bull World Health Organ. 2015. PMID: 25883410 Free PMC article.
-
Multimedia Informed Consent Tool for a Low Literacy African Research Population: Development and Pilot-Testing.J Clin Res Bioeth. 2014 Apr 5;5(3):178. doi: 10.4172/2155-9627.1000178. J Clin Res Bioeth. 2014. PMID: 25133065 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical