Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Jul;90(5):377-80.
doi: 10.1308/003588408X301172.

Non-attendance at the colorectal clinic: a prospective audit

Affiliations

Non-attendance at the colorectal clinic: a prospective audit

Lorraine Corfield et al. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2008 Jul.

Erratum in

  • Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2008 Sep;90(6):540

Abstract

Introduction: Non-attendance in the out-patient department has financial costs for the NHS and clinical implications to the non-attender and those awaiting an appointment. The aim of this audit was to quantify the percentage of non-attenders at colorectal clinics in a UK teaching hospital, assess which factors affected attendance, establish why individuals fail to attend and to implement appropriate change.

Patients and methods: The number of 'did-not-attend' patients was recorded initially for 686 appointments. Non-attenders were contacted by post or telephone to ask why this was so. The study was then repeated following telephone reminders to 391 patients due to attend clinic. The 'did-not-attend' rates in the two limbs of the completed audit cycle were then compared.

Results: The initial study revealed a 'did-not-attend' rate of 21%, with significantly more males than females failing to attend (males, 28.6%; females, 16.9%; P = 0.001). The 'did-not-attend' rate was not significantly affected by the day of the week, time of appointment or by the weather. There were 51.7% responses to either the postal or telephone questionnaire regarding non-attendance. Of these, 27.7% did not receive an appointment letter or received it after the appointment. Hospital administration problems were cited as accounting for 34.2% of 'did-not-attends'. In the post-intervention limb, 87 patients (22%) replied to the reminder telephone call, of whom 9 (10%) cancelled their appointment and 78 (90%) confirmed that they would attend. The 'did-not-attend' rate fell to 19.7% although this was not a significant reduction.

Conclusions: Telephoning patients before their appointments is labour intensive and did not significantly improve the 'did-not-attend' rate. Although hospital administration errors account for a significant number of the 'did-not-attends', patients also have a responsibility to notify the hospital if they are unable to attend.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Distribution of ‘did-not-attend’ patients according to age.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Response when asked why patient did not attend.

Comment in

  • 'Lean' out-patient clinics.
    Siriwardana HP, Buchanan GN. Siriwardana HP, et al. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2009 Mar;91(2):178-9; author reply 179. doi: 10.1308/003588409X391992. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2009. PMID: 19317943 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

References

    1. Jones R. A pretty little sum. Health Service J. 2001 Feb;:28–31. - PubMed
    1. Hamilton W, Round A, Sharp D. Patient, hospital and general practitioner characteristics associated with non-attendance: a cohort study. Br J Gen Pract. 2002;52:317–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gatrad AR. A completed audit to reduce hospital outpatients non-attendance rates. Arch Dis Child. 2000;82:59–61. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ross JDC, McIver A, Blakely A, Dalrymple J, Peacock W, Wallis C. Why do patients default from follow-up at a genitourinary clinic? A multivariate analysis. Genitourin Med. 1995;71:393–5. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dickey W, Morrow JI. Can outpatient non-attendance be predicted from the referral letter? An audit of default at neurology clinics. J R Soc Med. 1991;84:662–3. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms