Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Jul;107(1):107-12.
doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31817342c2.

The effects of fentanyl-like opioids and hydromorphone on human 5-HT3A receptors

Affiliations

The effects of fentanyl-like opioids and hydromorphone on human 5-HT3A receptors

Maria Wittmann et al. Anesth Analg. 2008 Jul.

Abstract

Background: 5-HT(3) receptors are involved in various physiologic functions, including the modulation of emesis. 5-HT(3) antagonists are clinically widely used as potent antiemetics. Emesis is also a side effect of opioid analgesics. Intriguingly, the natural opioid morphine shows specific interactions with human 5-HT(3) receptors at clinically relevant concentrations. In the present study, we investigated whether this is a general effect of opioids, even when they are structurally diverse. Therefore, another morphine (phenanthrene-type) derivative, hydromorphone, and fentanyl including its (4-anilinopiperidine-type) derivatives were tested.

Methods: Whole-cell patches from human embryonic kidney-293 cells, stably transfected with the human 5-HT(3A) receptor cDNA, were used to determine the opioid effects on the 5-HT (3 microM)-induced currents using the patch clamp technique (voltage-clamp).

Results: None of the fentanyl derivatives affected currents through the 5-HT(3A) receptor (3 microM 5-HT) significantly in the clinically relevant nanomolar concentration range (IC(50) values >30 microM). In contrast, hydromorphone was considerably more potent (IC(50) = 5.3 microM), slowing the current activation- and desensitization-kinetics significantly (at 3 microM by a factor of 1.9 and 2.4, respectively), similar to morphine. At concentrations much higher than clinically relevant, but within the range predicted from Meyer-Overton correlations for nonspecific interactions, the fentanyl derivatives all showed at least a tendency to suppress current amplitudes, but they had diverse effects on the activation- and desensitization-kinetics of 5-HT(3A) receptors.

Conclusions: Only morphine and hydromorphone, but not the fentanyl derivatives, reduced 5-HT-induced current amplitudes and slowed current kinetics near clinically relevant concentrations. The high potencies of morphine and hydromorphone, when compared to their lipophilicities, suggest a specific interaction with 5-HT(3A) receptors. In contrast, the effects of fentanyl-type opioids appear to be of unspecific nature. Because the rank order of opioid potencies for human 5-HT(3A) receptors is opposite of that for opioid receptors, the site involved is structurally different from opioid receptor binding sites. In agreement with recent data on different phenols, a phenolic OH-group (which morphine and hydromorphone possess) may contribute to specific interactions of morphine and hydromorphone with the 5-HT(3A) receptor. Future clinical studies could test whether corresponding differences in emetogenicity between different classes of opioids will be found.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources