The Pittsburgh Lung Screening Study (PLuSS): outcomes within 3 years of a first computed tomography scan
- PMID: 18635890
- PMCID: PMC2720144
- DOI: 10.1164/rccm.200802-336OC
The Pittsburgh Lung Screening Study (PLuSS): outcomes within 3 years of a first computed tomography scan
Abstract
Rationale: The role of computed tomography (CT) screening for lung cancer is controversial, currently under study, and not yet fully elucidated.
Objectives: To report findings from initial and 1-year repeat screening low-radiation-dose CT of the chest and 3-year outcomes for 50- to 79-year-old current and ex-smokers in the Pittsburgh Lung Screening Study (PLuSS).
Methods: Notified of findings on screening CT, subjects received diagnostic advice from both study and personal physicians. Tracking subjects for up to three years since initial screening, we obtained medical records to document diagnostic procedures, lung cancer diagnoses, and deaths.
Measurements and main results: 3,642 and 3,423 subjects had initial and repeat screening. A total of 1,477 (40.6% of 3,624) were told about noncalcified lung nodules on the initial screening and, before repeat screening, 821 (55.6% of 1,477, 22.5% of 3,642) obtained one or more subsequent diagnostic imaging studies (CT, positron emission tomography [PET], or PET-CT). Tracking identified 80 subjects with lung cancer, including 53 subjects with tumor seen at initial screening. In all, 36 subjects (1.0% of the 3,642 screened), referred for abnormalities on either the initial or repeat screening, had a major thoracic surgical procedure (thoracotomy, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery [VATS], median sternotomy, or mediastinoscopy) leading to a noncancer final diagnosis. Out of 82 subjects with thoracotomy or VATS to exclude malignancy in a lung nodule, 28 (34.1%) received a noncancer final diagnosis. Forty of 69 (58%) subjects with non-small cell lung cancer had stage I disease at diagnosis.
Conclusions: Though leading to the discovery of early stage lung cancer, CT screening also led to many diagnostic follow-up procedures, including major thoracic surgical procedures with noncancer outcomes.
Comment in
-
Minimizing unintended consequences of detecting lung nodules by computed tomography.Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008 Nov 1;178(9):891-2. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200808-1257ED. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008. PMID: 18945870 No abstract available.
-
Follow-up diagnostic procedures in lung cancer screening.Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009 Jul 1;180(1):102-3; author reply 103. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.180.1.102. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009. PMID: 19535669 No abstract available.
References
-
- Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Murray T, Thum M. Cancer statistics, 2008. CA Cancer J Clin 2008;58:71–96. - PubMed
-
- Smith RA, Cokkinides V, Eyre HJ. Cancer screening in the United States, 2007: a review of current guidelines, practices, and prospects. CA Cancer J Clin 2007;57:90–104. - PubMed
-
- Diederich S, Wormanns D, Semik M, Thomas M, Lenzen H, Roos N, Heindel W. Screening for early lung cancer with low-dose spiral CT: prevalence in 817 asymptomatic smokers. Radiology 2002;222:773–781. - PubMed
-
- Henschke CI, McCauley DI, Yankelevitz DF, Naidich DP, McGuinness G, Miettenen OS, Libby DM, Pasmantier NW, Koizumi J, Altorki NK, et al. Early Lung Cancer Action Project: overall design and findings from baseline screening. Lancet 1999;354:99–105. - PubMed
-
- Kaneko M, Eguchi K, Ohmatsu H, Kakinuma R, Naruke T, Suemasu K, Moriyama N. Peripheral lung cancer: screening and detection with low-dose spiral CT versus radiography. Radiology 1996;201:798–802. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical