Cost-effectiveness analysis on screening for colorectal neoplasm and management of colorectal cancer in Asia
- PMID: 18638075
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03726.x
Cost-effectiveness analysis on screening for colorectal neoplasm and management of colorectal cancer in Asia
Abstract
Background: Faecal occult blood testing (FOBT), flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) and colonoscopy are recommended for subjects above 50 years of age for screening for colorectal cancer (CRC).
Aim: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of FOBT, FS and colonoscopy on the basis of disease prevalence, compliance rate and cost of screening procedures in Asian countries.
Methods: A hypothetical population of 100 000 persons aged 50 undergoes either FOBT annually, FS every 5 years or colonoscopy every 10 years until the age of 80 years. Patients with positive FOBT or polyp in FS are offered colonoscopy. Surveillance colonoscopy is repeated every 3 years. The treatment cost of CRC, including surgery and chemotherapy, was evaluated. A Markov model was used to compare the cost-effectiveness of different screening strategies.
Results: Assuming a compliance rate of 90%, colonoscopy, FS and FOBT can reduce CRC incidence by 54.1%, 37.1% and 29.3% respectively. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for FOBT (US$6222 per life-year saved) is lower than FS (US$8044 per life-year saved) and colonoscopy (US$7211 per life-year saved). When the compliance rate drops to 50% and 30%, FOBT still has the lowest ICER.
Conclusion: FOBT is cost-effective compared to FS or colonoscopy for CRC screening in average-risk individuals aged from 50 to 80 years.
Similar articles
-
Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening colonoscopy vs. sigmoidoscopy and alternative strategies.Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Jan;108(1):120-32. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.380. Epub 2012 Dec 18. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013. PMID: 23247579
-
Colon cancer prevention in Italy: cost-effectiveness analysis with CT colonography and endoscopy.Dig Liver Dis. 2007 Mar;39(3):242-50. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2006.09.016. Epub 2006 Nov 16. Dig Liver Dis. 2007. PMID: 17112797
-
Randomized trial of different screening strategies for colorectal cancer: patient response and detection rates.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005 Mar 2;97(5):347-57. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dji050. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005. PMID: 15741571 Clinical Trial.
-
Screening for colorectal cancer.Tech Coloproctol. 2004 Nov;8 Suppl 1:s10-3. doi: 10.1007/s10151-004-0098-9. Tech Coloproctol. 2004. PMID: 15655587 Review.
-
Colon cancer screening. Sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy.Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 1997 Jul;7(3):365-86. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 1997. PMID: 9177140 Review.
Cited by
-
The Use of a Non-Invasive Biomarker for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Comparative Cost-Effectiveness Modeling Study.Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jan 19;15(3):633. doi: 10.3390/cancers15030633. Cancers (Basel). 2023. PMID: 36765591 Free PMC article.
-
Validity of APCS score as a risk prediction score for advanced colorectal neoplasia in Chinese asymptomatic subjects: A prospective colonoscopy study.Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Oct;95(41):e5123. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005123. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016. PMID: 27741134 Free PMC article.
-
Cost-effectiveness of total colonoscopy in screening of colorectal cancer in Japan.Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2012;2012:728454. doi: 10.1155/2012/728454. Epub 2012 Jan 12. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2012. PMID: 22291697 Free PMC article.
-
Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening under different scenarios of colonoscopy adherence: a microsimulation study.BMJ Public Health. 2025 May 26;3(1):e001344. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2024-001344. eCollection 2025. BMJ Public Health. 2025. PMID: 40433064 Free PMC article.
-
Predictors of colorectal cancer screening intention among Iranian adults: an application of the preventive health model.J Prev Med Hyg. 2018 Jun 1;59(2):E159-E166. eCollection 2018 Jun. J Prev Med Hyg. 2018. PMID: 30083624 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical