Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Apr;53(4):469-76.
doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.05.035. Epub 2008 Jul 21.

Use of a computerized forcing function improves performance in ordering restraints

Affiliations

Use of a computerized forcing function improves performance in ordering restraints

Richard T Griffey et al. Ann Emerg Med. 2009 Apr.

Abstract

Study objective: We evaluate the effect of a computerized order entry system forcing function on improving timely renewal of restraint orders.

Methods: In this prospective study of 2 successive interventions, physicians received computerized reminders to renew or discontinue restraint orders before their expiration. The initial intervention allowed acknowledgement of this reminder without further consequence, changing at 6 months to deny computer access until addressed. We performed chart review on emergency department visits with restraint orders in 3 consecutive 6-month periods (A, B, C) separated by these 2 interventions, determining time to order renewal, number of restraint orders, renewal orders per hour in restraints, and time in restraints and evaluating variability in these values across study intervals. Statistical analysis for our primary outcome used the Mann-Whitney and variance ratio tests.

Results: Median time to order renewal decreased in periods B and C versus A by 64 and 56 minutes, respectively, with variability in this measure decreasing across all periods. Mean number of restraint orders in periods B and C significantly increased versus those in A (1.46 to 1.89 to 2.34), with corresponding increases in variability. Mean renewal orders per hour in restraint significantly increased in period C versus A and B, from 0.08 to 0.23 to 0.89, with increasing variability across all periods. Decreases in median time spent in restraints observed in periods B and C versus A of 45 and 105 minutes, respectively, trended toward but did not achieve significance, with significantly decreasing variability compared with baseline.

Conclusion: The forcing function improved restraint reordering and variability in practice and may have contributed to nonsignificant reductions observed in time in restraint.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Forcing functions: the need for restraint.
    Bisantz AM, Wears RL. Bisantz AM, et al. Ann Emerg Med. 2009 Apr;53(4):477-9. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.07.019. Epub 2008 Aug 22. Ann Emerg Med. 2009. PMID: 18722691 No abstract available.

LinkOut - more resources