Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Sep 19;283(38):26274-82.
doi: 10.1074/jbc.M804723200. Epub 2008 Jul 18.

Bcl-xL and UVRAG cause a monomer-dimer switch in Beclin1

Affiliations

Bcl-xL and UVRAG cause a monomer-dimer switch in Beclin1

Christian G Noble et al. J Biol Chem. .

Abstract

Beclin1 has a key regulatory role in the initiation of autophagy and is a tumor suppressor. We have examined the interplay between viral or human Bcl-2-like proteins and UVRAG and their opposite effects on Beclin1. We show that Beclin1 forms a dimer in solution via its coiled-coil domain both in vivo and in vitro. Viral Bcl-2 binds independently to two sites on the Beclin1 dimer, one with high affinity and one with lower affinity, whereas human Bcl-x(L) binds both sites equally with relatively low affinity. UVRAG disrupts the Beclin1-dimer interface, forming a heterodimer with Beclin1, suggesting that this is how UVRAG causes its effects on Beclin1 to activate autophagy. Both Bcl-2-like proteins reduce the affinity of UVRAG for Beclin1 approximately 4-fold, suggesting that they stabilize the Beclin1 dimer. Moreover, coimmunoprecipitation assays show that UVRAG substantially reduces Beclin1 dimerization in vivo. These data explain the concentration-dependent interplay between Bcl-2, UVRAG, and Beclin1, as both tumor suppressors, UVRAG and Beclin1, have single-copy mutations in human cancers. Furthermore, our data suggest that an alternative strategy for developing anti-cancer compounds would be to disrupt the Beclin1-dimer interface.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.
Beclin1 CCD dimerizes in solution. Beclin1 CCD (A) and Beclin1 BH3-CCD (B) were analyzed by sedimentation equilibrium and fitted to an ideal single-species model. Representative fits for each protein are shown. C, Beclin1 CCD and Beclin1 BH3-CCD were also analyzed by sedimentation velocity and fitted to the c(S) and c(M) size-distribution functions. The c(M) distribution is shown for both proteins.
FIGURE 2.
FIGURE 2.
Two vBcl-2 molecules bind the Beclin1 dimer; one with high and one lower affinity. A, binding isotherm using ITC for vBcl-2 in the injection syringe titrated into Beclin1 BH3-CCD in the cell. The data were fitted to a two-site binding model (lower panel). B, a complex of vBcl-2-Beclin1 BH3-CCD was co-purified and analyzed by sedimentation equilibrium. The data were fitted to a heterodimer model in which vBcl-2 bound by two separate events to the Beclin1 dimer. A representative fit is shown. C, ITC titration for vBcl-2 in the syringe and Beclin1 BH3 peptide in the cell, and the data were fitted to a single-site model.
FIGURE 3.
FIGURE 3.
Bcl-xL binds to Beclin1 by a different mechanism from vBcl-2. ITC titrations with Bcl-xL in the syringe and Beclin1 BH3-CCD (A) or Beclin1 BH3 (B) peptide in the cell. The data were fitted to single-site models.
FIGURE 4.
FIGURE 4.
UVRAG disrupts the Beclin1 dimer interface. A, ITC titration for UVRAG CCD in the injection syringe and Beclin1 BH3-CCD in the cell. B, analytical gel-filtration profiles, measured at 210 nm for Beclin1 CCD, UVRAG CCD, or a mixture of the two. C, ITC titration for vBcl-2 in the injection syringe and Beclin1 BH3-CCD in the cell in the presence of a 2-fold excess of UVRAG CCD. The ITC data were fitted to a single-site model.
FIGURE 5.
FIGURE 5.
Bcl-xL and Bcl-2 have a similar effect on the affinity of UVRAG for Beclin1. ITC titrations for UVRAG CCD in the syringe and Beclin1 BH3-CCD in the cell in the presence of a 2-fold excess of vBcl-2 (A) or Bcl-xL (B). The data were fitted to a single-site model and in the presence of Bcl-xL. n was held constant at 1.
FIGURE 6.
FIGURE 6.
Beclin1 co-localization with Bcl-xL in mitochondria is dependent on its BH3 domain. A, HeLa cells were transfected with YPet-Beclin1 (a-c), YPet-Beclin1 and mCherry-Bcl-xL (d-f), or YPet-Bcl-xL (h-i) and fixed after 6 h. Mitochondrial co-localization was assessed using MitoTracker (b and g). Panels c, f, and i are merged images of a and b, d and e, and g and h, respectively. The insets show an enlarged area (×3.4). B, representative images of COS-7 cells expressing YPet-Beclin1-(95-266) and mCherry-Bcl-xL (a-c) or YPet-Beclin1-(133-266) and mCherry-Bcl-xL (d-f). Panels c and f are merged images of a and b and or d and e, respectively.
FIGURE 7.
FIGURE 7.
Beclin1 dimerizes via its CCD domain and this interaction is inhibited by UVRAG in vivo. A, COS7 total cell lysate (TCL, 400 μg) co-expressing FLAG-SBP-Beclin1 and YPet-fusion proteins as indicated were collected on 25 μl of streptavidin-agarose beads, and after washing, 10% of material was assessed by Western blotting for bound YPet proteins. Total cell lysate (5%) was used for comparison. GFP, green fluorescent protein. B, COS7 cells expressing hemagglutinin (HA)-Beclin1 BH3-CCD, YPet-Beclin1 BH3-CCD, and FLAG constructs as indicated were collected on 25 μl of streptavidin-agarose beads and processed as for A.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Levine, B., and Yuan, J. (2005) J. Clin. Investig. 115 2679-2688 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Levine, B., and Klionsky, D. J. (2004) Dev. Cell 6 463-477 - PubMed
    1. Shimizu, S., Kanaseki, T., Mizushima, N., Mizuta, T., Arakawa-Kobayashi, S., Thompson, C. B., and Tsujimoto, Y. (2004) Nat. Cell Biol. 6 1221-1228 - PubMed
    1. Yu, L., Alva, A., Su, H., Dutt, P., Freundt, E., Welsh, S., Baehrecke, E. H., and Lenardo, M. J. (2004) Science 304 1500-1502 - PubMed
    1. Aita, V. M., Liang, X. H., Murty, V. V., Pincus, D. L., Yu, W., Cayanis, E., Kalachikov, S., Gilliam, T. C., and Levine, B. (1999) Genomics 59 59-65 - PubMed

Publication types