Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Jul 16;2008(3):CD004230.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004230.pub2.

Interventions for ketosis during labour

Jocelyn Toohill  1 , Barbara Soong, Vicki Flenady
Affiliations

Interventions for ketosis during labour

Jocelyn Toohill et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: In labour, ketosis (the elevation of ketone bodies in the blood) is a common occurrence, due to increased physical stress, which is often compounded by reduced oral intake. The effect of ketosis on the mother and baby during labour is not clear, therefore, there is uncertainty as to whether ketosis is a normal physiological response or whether women with ketosis in labour require intervention (such as intravenous fluids or increased oral intake) for maternal and infant wellbeing. This uncertainty has resulted in differences in opinion and practice by those providing care for women in labour.

Objectives: To assess the effects on maternal, fetal and neonatal outcomes of intravenous fluids or increased oral intake administered to women in labour for the treatment of ketosis compared with no intervention (defined as no oral intake, ice chips only, or oral intake on demand) and to also assess the effects of different types of intravenous fluids administered.

Search strategy: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (January 2008), CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2007, Issue 2), MEDLINE (1950 to January 2007), EMBASE (1988 to January 2007) and CINAHL (1982 to 2007).

Selection criteria: All published and unpublished randomised trials in which additional oral intake or intravenous fluids, or both, were used for the treatment of women with ketosis in labour.

Data collection and analysis: Two authors independently assessed potentially eligible trials. The authors sought additional information on trial methods and outcome data to enable consideration of eligibility of studies. However, at the time of the review, no information was received.

Main results: We identified six trials as potentially eligible for inclusion in this review. All six studies were excluded. Therefore no trials are included in this review.

Authors' conclusions: There is no information on which to base practice in the treatment of women with ketosis during labour. Further research is required to identify more clearly the association between ketosis in labour and pregnancy outcome. Future trials should examine the effects of no interventions and different types of intravenous and oral fluids on these clinically important outcomes, and include women's perception and satisfaction with care during labour and birth.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None known.

Update of

  • doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004230

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

References to studies excluded from this review

Ames 1975 {published data only}
    1. Ames AC, Cobbold S, Maddock J. Lactic acidosis complicating treatment of ketosis of labour. BMJ 1975;4:611‐3. - PMC - PubMed
Clark 1971 {published data only}
    1. Clark RB, Stephens SR, Greifenstein FE. Fetal and maternal effects of bicarbonate administration during labor. Anesthesia & Analgesia 1971;50:713‐8. - PubMed
Inman 1971 {published data only}
    1. Inman SE. The treatment of ketosis in labour. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of the British Commonwealth 1971;78:624‐7. - PubMed
Lawrence 1982 {published data only}
    1. Lawrence GF, Brown VA, Parsons RJ. Feto‐maternal consequences of high‐dose glucose infusion during labour. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1982;89:27‐32. - PubMed
Menigaux 1993 {published data only}
    1. Menigaux C, Hamza J, Bougnieres P, Saint‐maurice CI. Neonatal glycemia: does the maternal IV fluid regimen during labor make a difference [abstract]. Regional Anesthesia 1993;18:91.
Morton 1985 {published data only}
    1. Morton KE, Jackson MC, Gillmer MDG. A comparison of the effects of four intravenous solutions for the treatment of ketonuria during labour. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1985;92:473‐9. - PubMed

Additional references

Anderson 1998
    1. Anderson T. Is ketosis in labour pathological. Practising Midwife 1998;1(9):22‐6. - PubMed
Broach 1988
    1. Broach J, Newton N. Food and beverages in labor. Part II: the effects of cessation of oral intake during labor. Birth 1988;15(2):88‐92. - PubMed
Deeks 2001
    1. Deeks JJ, Altman DG, Bradburn MJ. Statistical methods for examining heterogeneity and combining results from several studies in meta‐analysis. In: Egger M, Davey Smith G, Altman DG editor(s). Systematic reviews in health care: meta‐analysis in context. London: BMJ Books, 2001.
Dumoulin 1984
    1. Dumoulin JG, Foulkes JEB. Ketonuria during labour [commentary]. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1984;91(2):97‐8. - PubMed
Foulkes 1985
    1. Foulkes J, Dumoulin JG. The effects of ketonuria in labour. British Journal of Clinical Practice 1985;39(2):59‐62. - PubMed
Goer 1995
    1. Goer H. Obstetric myths versus research realities: a guide to the medical literature. Westport: Bergin & Garvey, 1995.
Hazle 1986
    1. Hazle NR. Hydration in labor‐‐is routine intravenous hydration necessary?. Journal of Nurse Midwifery 1986;31(4):171‐6. - PubMed
Higgins 2006
    1. Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 4.2.6 [updated September 2006]. The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, 2006. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Johnson 1989
    1. Johnson C, Keirse MJN, Chalmers I. Nutrition and hydration in labour. In: Enkin M, Keirse MJN, Neilson J, Crowther C, Duley L, Hodnett E, Hofmeyr J editor(s). A guide to effective care in pregnancy and childbirth. 2nd Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.
Keppler 1988
    1. Keppler A. The use of intravenous fluids during labor. Birth 1988;15(2):75‐9. - PubMed
Kubli 2002
    1. Kubli M, Scrutton MJ, Seed PT, O'Sullivan G. An evaluation of isotonic "sports drinks" during labor. Obstetric Anesthesia 2002;94(2):404‐8. - PubMed
Ludka 1993
    1. Ludka LM, Roberts CC. Eating and drinking in labor. A literature review. Journal of Nurse Midwifery 1993;38(4):199‐207. - PubMed
McKay 1988
    1. McKay S, Mahan C. Modifying the stomach contents of laboring women: why and how; success and risks. Birth 1988;15(4):213‐21. - PubMed
RevMan 2003 [Computer program]
    1. The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan). Version 4.2 for Windows. Oxford, England: The Cochrane Collaboration, 2003.
Scheepers 2002
    1. Scheepers HCJ, Thans MCJ, Jong PA, Essed GGM, Cessie S, Kanhai HHH. A double‐blind, randomised, placebo controlled study on the influence of carbohydrate solution intake during labour. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2002;109:178‐81. - PubMed
Singata 2002
    1. Singata M, Tranmer JE. Restricting oral fluid and food intake during labour. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2002, Issue 4. [Art. No.: CD003930. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003930] - PMC - PubMed
Sommer 2000
    1. Sommer PA, Norr K, Roberts J. Clinical decision‐making regarding intravenous hydration in normal labor in a birth center setting. Journal of Midwifery and Women's Health 2000;45(2):114‐21. - PubMed
Wasserstrum 1992
    1. Wasserstrum N. Issues in fluid management during labour: general considerations. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology 1992;35(3):505‐13. - PubMed

Publication types