Optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy after implantation

Abstract

Many patients do not respond clinically to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), despite clinical and survival benefits demonstrated in numerous clinical trials. This has led to focused evaluation from preimplant issues, as to who is an appropriate candidate for CRT, to postimplant issues, more specifically, optimizing device programming in CRT. CRT studies have used simultaneous biventricular pacing, but with advancing echocardiographic technology, the role of dyssynchrony, or mechanical delay in contraction of the ventricles, suggests that individually tailoring ventricular pacing improves hemodynamics. Atrial to ventricular timing affects left ventricular filling and cardiac output, whereas the right to left ventricular pacing delay also improves systolic and diastolic performance. The importance of device programming parameters and optimal pacing delays in biventricular pacing is reviewed in this article.