Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2008 Aug;191(2):396-401.
doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.3414.

Diagnostic performance of low-dose CT for the detection of urolithiasis: a meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Diagnostic performance of low-dose CT for the detection of urolithiasis: a meta-analysis

Tilo Niemann et al. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Aug.

Abstract

Objective: The objective of our study was to perform a meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic performance of low-dose CT for the diagnosis of urolithiasis (seven studies, 1,061 patients).

Materials and methods: The medical literature from 1995 to 2007 was searched using PubMed, Medline, and Cochrane Library databases for articles on studies that used low-dose CT (< 3 mSv dose applied for the entire CT examination) as a diagnostic test for the detection of urolithiasis. Prospective and retrospective studies were included if they separately reported the rate of true-positive, true-negative, false-positive, and false-negative diagnoses of urolithiasis from low-dose CT compared with the positive and negative rates of normal-dose CT or a combination of diagnostic tests. Two readers assessed the quality of the studies.

Results: The pooled sensitivity and specificity of low-dose CT for the diagnosis of urolithiasis were 0.966 (95% CI, 0.950-0.978) and 0.949 (95% CI, 0.920-0.970), respectively.

Conclusion: The results of this meta-analysis suggest that a low-dose CT protocol can be used as the initial imaging technique in the workup of patients with suspected urolithiasis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Body MDCT at 140 kV.
    Tack D, Gevenois PA. Tack D, et al. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Mar;192(3):W139-40; author reply W141-5. doi: 10.2214/AJR.08.1607. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009. PMID: 19234242 No abstract available.

Publication types

MeSH terms