Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Aug;179(4):2147-55.
doi: 10.1534/genetics.108.088070. Epub 2008 Jul 27.

Within-generation mutation variance for litter size in inbred mice

Affiliations

Within-generation mutation variance for litter size in inbred mice

Joaquim Casellas et al. Genetics. 2008 Aug.

Abstract

The mutational input of genetic variance per generation (sigma(m)(2)) is the lower limit of the genetic variability in inbred strains of mice, although greater values could be expected due to the accumulation of new mutations in successive generations. A mixed-model analysis using Bayesian methods was applied to estimate sigma(m)(2) and the across-generation accumulated genetic variability on litter size in 46 generations of a C57BL/6J inbred strain. This allowed for a separate inference on sigma(m)(2) and on the additive genetic variance in the base population (sigma(a)(2)). The additive genetic variance in the base generation was 0.151 and quickly decreased to almost null estimates in generation 10. On the other hand, sigma(m)(2) was moderate (0.035) and the within-generation mutational variance increased up to generation 14, then oscillating between 0.102 and 0.234 in remaining generations. This pattern suggested the existence of a continuous uploading of genetic variability for litter size (h(2)=0.045). Relevant genetic drift was not detected in this population. In conclusion, our approach allowed for separate estimation of sigma(a)(2) and sigma(m)(2) within the mixed-model framework, and the heritability obtained highlighted the significant and continuous influence of new genetic variability affecting the genetic stability of inbred strains.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

F<sc>igure</sc> 1.—
Figure 1.—
A priori distributions for formula image and formula image.
F<sc>igure</sc> 2.—
Figure 2.—
Mode (solid diamonds) and highest posterior density region at 95% (whiskers) of the average breeding value per generation.
F<sc>igure</sc> 3.—
Figure 3.—
Mode (solid diamonds) and highest posterior density region (whiskers) of the within-generation additive genetic variance (formula image).
F<sc>igure</sc> 4.—
Figure 4.—
Mode (solid diamonds) and highest posterior density region (whiskers) of the within-generation mutational variance (formula image).

References

    1. Bailey, D. W., 1977. Sources of subline divergence and their relative importance for sublines of six major inbred strains of mice, pp. 197–215 in Origins of Inbred Mice, edited by H. C. Morse. Academic Press, New York.
    1. Bailey, D. W., 1982. How pure are inbred strains of mice? Immunol. Today 3 210–214. - PubMed
    1. Bhuvanakumar, C. K., R. C. Roberts and W. G. Hill, 1985. Heterosis among lines of mice selected for body weight. Theor. Appl. Genet. 71 52–56. - PubMed
    1. Blasco, A., 2001. The Bayesian controversy in animal breeding. J. Anim. Sci. 79 2023–2046. - PubMed
    1. Blasco, A., D. Sorensen and J. P. Bidanel, 1998. Bayesian inference of genetic parameters and selection response for litter size components in pigs. Genetics 149 301–306. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types