The impact of the Medicare Part D prescription benefit on generic drug use
- PMID: 18661190
- PMCID: PMC2533371
- DOI: 10.1007/s11606-008-0742-6
The impact of the Medicare Part D prescription benefit on generic drug use
Abstract
Background: Little information exists regarding the impact of Medicare Part D on generic drug use.
Objective: To examine changes in the use of generic prescriptions attributable to Part D among a sample of Medicare beneficiaries.
Design, participants, and measurements: Difference-in-difference analysis of pharmacy claims of Part D enrollees and non-enrollees aged 67-79 years from 2005 to 2006. The final sample represented approximately 2.4 million unique subjects. Analyses were conducted separately for major therapeutic classes, limited to subjects filling at least one prescription within the class during 2005 and 2006, and adjusted for subject characteristics, prescription characteristics, socio-demographic characteristics measured through zipcode-linked Census data, baseline differences between Part D and non-Part D enrollees, and secular trends in generic use.
Results: Generic drugs accounted for 58% of total prescriptions. Among the entire group of beneficiaries, there was a trend of increased generic drug use in 13 out of 15 drug classes examined. However, after adjusting for potential confounders, the growth rate of generic drug use was lower among Part D enrollees than among non-enrollees; enrollees were slightly less likely to fill prescriptions for generic drugs vs. brand-name drugs in 2006 compared to 2005 (odds ratio 0.95, 95% confidence interval 0.94-0.95).
Conclusions: Despite secular trends of increased utilization of generic drugs among both Part D enrollees and non-enrollees, the net impact of Part D among these beneficiaries was a modest decrease in the use of generic drugs. This finding, which is consistent with economic theory but contrary to several recent reports, highlights the complexity of assessing the impact of Part D on overall consumer welfare.
References
-
- {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '15353431', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15353431/'}]}
- Doherty RB. Assessing the new Medicare prescription drug law. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141:391–5. - PubMed
-
- {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1377/hlthaff.25.w344', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.25.w344'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '16882686', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16882686/'}]}
- Heiss F, McFadden D, Winter J. Who failed to enroll in Medicare Part D, and why? Early results. Health Affairs. 2006;25:w344–54. - PubMed
-
- {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1377/hlthaff.26.1.w1', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.26.1.w1'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '17118944', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17118944/'}]}
- Cubanski J, Neuman P. Status report on Medicare Part D enrollment in 2006: analysis of plan-specific market share and coverage. Health Aff. 2006;26:w1–12. - PubMed
-
- Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services Press Release. Medicare drug plans strong and growing: beneficiaries compared plans and continued to sign up for prescription drug coverage. January 30, 2007. http://www.cms.hhs.gov/apps/media/press_releases.asp (Accessed July 7, 2008).
-
- {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1377/hlthaff.23.1.113', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.23.1.113'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '15002634', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15002634/'}]}
- Pauly MV. Medicare drug coverage and moral hazard. Health Aff. 2004;23:113–22. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
