Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Aug-Sep;655(1-2):36-40.
doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2008.06.014.

Genotoxic effects of waterpipe smoking on the buccal mucosa cells

Affiliations

Genotoxic effects of waterpipe smoking on the buccal mucosa cells

Maged El-Setouhy et al. Mutat Res. 2008 Aug-Sep.

Abstract

Waterpipe smoking is popular in many parts of the world. Micronuclei (MN) evaluation in the exfoliated oral cells of smokers is a non-invasive technique for evaluation of possible tobacco harm. We aimed to assess whether MN levels are higher in waterpipe smokers than in never smokers. We examined oral smears of 128 adult male waterpipe smokers and 78 males who never smoked tobacco in rural Egypt. The total number of MN per 1000 cells per subject, and the number of MN-containing cells per individual were compared. We observed a higher level of total MN in waterpipe smokers (10 +/- 4) than in never smokers (4 +/- 2, p < 0.001). A similar difference was found for the mean number of affected cells per individual (8 +/- 3 vs. 4 +/- 1.62, p < 0.001). MN levels were not significantly dose related. This study is among the first to assess the association between waterpipe smoking and a cytogenetic measure of tobacco harm. The twofold increase in MN level is consistent with previous reports of MN in cigarette smokers. More research is needed to determine if such MN levels are predictive of future health consequences.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Buccal smear shows micronuclei Pap stained. X1000.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Buccal smear shows karyorrhexis (fragmented nucleus). Pap stained. X1000.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Buccal smear shows micronuclei (opaque with phase contrast). Pap stained. X1000.
Figure 4
Figure 4
The mean number of TMN and CMN in never smokers and waterpipe smokers.
Figure 5
Figure 5
The mean number of TMN in never smokers and waterpipe smokers

Comment in

References

    1. Nersesyan AK, Vardazaryan NS, Gevorgyan AL, Arutyunyan RM. Micronucleus level in exfoliated buccal mucosa cells of cancer patients. Arch Oncol. 2002;10:35–36.
    1. Desai SS, Ghaisas SD, Jakhi SD, Bhide SV. Cytogenetic damage in exfoliated oral mucosal cells and circulating lymphocytes of patients suffering from precancerous oral lesions. Cancer Lett. 1996;109:9–14. - PubMed
    1. Ramirez A, Gattas GJF, Carvalho MB, Rapoport A, Saldanha PH. Clinical implications of micronuclei frequency as a biomonitor for alcoholic patients with oral carcinomas. In: Varma AK, editor. Oral Oncology. Vol. 6. London: Macmillan; 1999. pp. 199–204.
    1. Ramirez A, Saldanha PH. Micronucleus investigation of alcoholic patients with oral carcinomas. Genet Mol Res. 2002;1:246–260. - PubMed
    1. Chandrika J, Piyathilake CJ, Bell WC, Oelschlager DK, Heimburger DC, Grizzle WE. The pattern of expression of Mn and Cu-Zn superoxide dismutase varies among squamous cell cancers of the lung, larynx, and oral cavity. Head & Neck. 2002;24:859–867. - PubMed

Publication types