Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Jul 29;179(3):229-34.
doi: 10.1503/cmaj.080012.

Risk of development of diabetes mellitus after diagnosis of gestational diabetes

Affiliations

Risk of development of diabetes mellitus after diagnosis of gestational diabetes

Denice S Feig et al. CMAJ. .

Erratum in

  • CMAJ. 2008 Aug 12;179(4):344

Abstract

Background: It is generally appreciated that gestational diabetes is a risk factor for type 2 diabetes. However, the precise relation between these 2 conditions remains unknown. We sought to determine the incidence of diabetes mellitus after diagnosis of gestational diabetes.

Methods: We used a population-based database to identify all deliveries in the province of Ontario over the 7-year period from Apr. 1, 1995, to Mar. 31, 2002. We linked these births to mothers who had been given a diagnosis of gestational diabetes through another administrative database that records people with diabetes on the basis of either physician service claims or hospital admission records. We examined database records for these women from the time of delivery until Mar. 31, 2004, a total of 9 years. We determined the presence of diabetes mellitus according to a validated administrative database definition for this condition.

Results: We identified 659 164 pregnant women who had no pre-existing diabetes. Of these, 21 823 women (3.3%) had a diagnosis of gestational diabetes. The incidence of gestational diabetes rose significantly over the 9-year study period, from 3.2% in 1995 to 3.6% in 2001 (p < 0.001). The probability of diabetes developing after gestational diabetes was 3.7% at 9 months after delivery and 18.9% at 9 years after delivery. After adjustment for age, urban or rural residence, neighbourhood income quintile, whether the woman had a previous pregnancy, whether the woman had hypertension after the index delivery, and primary care level before the index delivery, the most significant risk factor for diabetes was having had gestational diabetes during the index pregnancy (hazard ratio 37.28, 95% confidence interval 34.99-40.88; p < 0.001). Age, urban residence and lower income were also important factors. When analyzed by year of delivery, the rate of development of diabetes was higher among the latest subcohort of women with gestational diabetes (delivery during 1999-2001) than among the earliest subcohort (delivery during 1995 or 1996) (16% by 4.7 years after delivery v. 16% by 9.0 years).

Interpretation: In this large population-based study, the rate of development of diabetes after gestational diabetes increased over time and was almost 20% by 9 years. This estimate should be used by clinicians to assist in their counselling of pregnant women and by policy-makers to target these women for screening and prevention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
Figure 1: Identification of cohort (using a national database of hospital discharge information prepared by the Canadian Institute for Health Information) and loss to follow-up.
None
Figure 2: Cumulative incidence rate of diabetes mellitus.
None
Figure 3: Cumulative incidence rate of diabetes mellitus for women with gestational diabetes by year group.

Comment in

References

    1. Narayan KM, Boyle JP, Geiss LS, et al. Impact of recent increase in incidence on future diabetes burden: U.S., 2005–2050. Diabetes Care 2006;29:2114-6. - PubMed
    1. Janssen PG, Gorter KJ, Stolk RP, et al. Low yield of population-based screening for type 2 diabetes in the Netherlands: the ADDITION Netherlands study. Fam Pract 2007;24:555-61. - PubMed
    1. Canadian Diabetes Association Clinical Practice Guidelines Expert Committee. Canadian Diabetes Association 2003 clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and management of diabetes in Canada. Can J Diabetes 2003:27 Suppl 2:S1-152. - PubMed
    1. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes. II. Screening for diabetes. Diabetes Care 2007;30 Suppl 1:S5-7. - PubMed
    1. US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for type 2 diabetes mellitus in adults: recommendations and rationale. Ann Intern Med 2003;138:212-4. - PubMed

Publication types