Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2008 Sep;17(9):1193-200.
doi: 10.1007/s00586-008-0718-6. Epub 2008 Jul 29.

Intensive group training protocol versus guideline physiotherapy for patients with chronic low back pain: a randomised controlled trial

Nicole van der Roer  1 , Maurits van Tulder, Johanna Barendse, Dirk Knol, Willem van Mechelen, Henrica de Vet
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Intensive group training protocol versus guideline physiotherapy for patients with chronic low back pain: a randomised controlled trial

Nicole van der Roer et al. Eur Spine J. 2008 Sep.

Abstract

Intensive group training using principles of graded activity has been proven to be effective in occupational care for workers with chronic low back pain. Objective of the study was to compare the effects of an intensive group training protocol aimed at returning to normal daily activities and guideline physiotherapy for primary care patients with non-specific chronic low back pain. The study was designed as pragmatic randomised controlled trial with a setup of 105 primary care physiotherapists in 49 practices and 114 patients with non-specific low back pain of more than 12 weeks duration participated in the study. In the intensive group training protocol exercise therapy, back school and operant-conditioning behavioural principles are combined. Patients were treated during 10 individual sessions along 20 group sessions. Usual care consisted of physiotherapy according to the Dutch guidelines for Low Back Pain. Main outcome measures were functional disability (Roland Morris disability questionnaire), pain intensity, perceived recovery and sick leave because of low back pain assessed at baseline and after 6, 13, 26 and 52 weeks. Both an intention-to-treat analysis and a per-protocol analysis were performed. Multilevel analysis did not show significant differences between both treatment groups on any outcome measures during the complete follow-up period, with one exception. After 26 weeks the protocol group showed more reduction in pain intensity than the guideline group, but this difference was absent after 52 weeks. We finally conclude that an intensive group training protocol was not more effective than usual physiotherapy for chronic low back pain.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Bekkering GE, Hendriks HJM, Koes BW, Oostendorp RAB, Ostelo RWJG, Thomassen JMC, van Tulder MW. National Practice Guideline for the physiotherapeutic management of patients with low back pain. Physiotherapy. 2003;89:82–96. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9406(05)60579-2. - DOI
    1. Bombardier C, Hayden J, Beaton DE. Minimal clinically important difference. Low back pain: outcome measures. J Rheumatol. 2001;28:431–438. - PubMed
    1. Downie WW, Leatham PA, Rhind VM, Wright V, Branco JA, Anderson JA. Studies with pain rating scales. Ann Rheum Dis. 1978;37:378–381. doi: 10.1136/ard.37.4.378. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Farrar JT, Young JP, Jr, LaMoreaux L, Werth JL, Poole RM. Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain. 2001;94:149–158. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00349-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hakkaart-van Roijen L, van Straten A, Donker M, Tiemens M. Manual trimbos/iMTA questionnaire for costs associated with psychiatric illness (TiC-P) Rotterdam: Rotterdam Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University; 2002.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources